employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

CompuGroup Medical US

Is this your company?

Case review on how to destroy a company... CGM and Out of Touch Foreign Executives - Director CompuGroup Medical US Employee Review

1.0
Apr 21, 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The Employees!!! While every company has its share of bad apples (lazy, unqualified, etc.), the majority of CGM's employees are really good people. I consider myself fortunate to have been able to work with such good people. Unfortunately, many of them are already gone. They were either let go during one of the many restructurings/layoffs, or they moved on to better places.

Cons

I want to start off by saying that many of the bad reviews previously posted on Glassdoor are understatements. The current CEO (Norbert Fischl) was so upset by these reviews that he has “encouraged” staff numerous times to write positive reviews to counter the negative ones. There were also rumors that the CEO personally wrote one of the few positive reviews as well as asking in-house counsel to sue Glassdoor for slander. While I’m not positive on whether these actually happened, there is one positive review that is obviously written by a foreigner who writes/sounds very similar to the CEO. For me, this casts a serious shadow on the accuracy of the few positive reviews. I can’t stress this enough - Anyone who is considering accepting a job with CGM should know that the negative reviews are FAR more accurate that the positive ones. Below are examples of some of the most egregious decisions made by the CEO & COO (Kent Brostrom): • Refusal to pay employees previously agreed compensation – Senior managers were denied their bonuses, even though they were part of their agreed upon compensation. CEO & COO refused to even set bonus targets for management so there was no way to meet the targets. CEO & COO also refused to pay normal employees merit/COL increases after the employees were told that they would receive them. • Refusal to acknowledge work/life balance – Employee personal lives & wellbeing are so blatantly disregarded that sleeping on the floor of the office is accepted/encouraged. Vacation/PTO time is not honored. Employees are still expected to work while on PTO. I was personally “asked” to attend a meeting at midnight on a Sunday, while I was on vacation. • Environment of manufactured stress – Unrealistic deadlines are the norm. Everything, no matter how trivial, is needed “on short notice”, or “still today” regardless of day/time (11pm Friday, 5am Sunday, etc.). The best part is that everyone would kill themselves to fulfill the request during the unreasonable timeline, when the executives wouldn’t even review it for days after it was provided. • Misleading (maybe untruthful) statements told to customers & employees – CEO & COO would constantly say how great the company is doing. Even though the smart/good employees were all looking for new jobs and customers were terminating left and right. Decisions were explained in a way that, while probably not illegal, were definitely morally questionable\wrong. There were a few occasions that I felt like a sleazy used car salesman when trying to convince clients to stay or explain to employees the latest terrible decision made by the COO/CEO. I could go on and on, but I think this is enough for any rational person reading this to get the picture. CGM is not a company that is employee or client focused. The current executive team (CEO & COO) have little respect for their employees/clients. That coupled with their amazing propensity for poor decision making, I can honestly say that I will be surprised if CGM US doesn’t go out of business in the near future.

Explore other reviews about CompuGroup Medical US

5.0
Mar 25, 2025
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Strong US company segment backed by larger international presence. Very strong leadership team.

Cons

High expectations of the employees.

2.0
Mar 4, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The people I worked with day-to-day were collaborative and easy to work with. Fully remote position with somewhat competitive base pay. Direct managers were hands-off in a good way — trusted you to get the work done.

Cons

Culture and leadership significantly deteriorated following the acquisition, resulting in a vastly different employee experience than the one that originally attracted talent to the organization. Executive leadership lacks strategic vision and fails to foster an inclusive, psychologically safe workplace. The legal and compliance function suffers from poor cross-functional alignment and is consistently excluded from key business decisions, resulting in reactive rather than proactive risk management. Compensation reviews are infrequent with limited transparency around pay equity and merit increases. Benefits packages are below market standard. Leadership at the senior level demonstrates poor people management skills and emotional intelligence, contributing to a high-stress, low-trust culture. Organizational direction is unclear, leaving teams without the executive sponsorship needed to drive meaningful impact. A DEI program was in place but was discontinued, signaling a lack of genuine organizational commitment to inclusion beyond surface-level efforts.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All