Extremely disappointing work environment — both professionally and culturally - Software Engineer CrowdStrike Employee Review

1.0
Dec 8, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

* Compensation is competitive. * Some talented engineers in other teams. * The mission of the company is meaningful, even if not reflected in day-to-day work.

Cons

Team culture was surprisingly hostile and unprofessional. Discussions routinely derailed into aggressive political arguments, with comments that were inappropriate or offensive. Management was aware but did not intervene, which made the environment uncomfortable and stressful. Lack of teamwork and collaboration. Colleagues often avoided helping each other, and even small acts like organizing a gift for a teammate’s life event were ignored. There was a sense of mistrust and people frequently reported on each other instead of addressing issues constructively. Poor technical leadership. Work mostly revolved around patching legacy code with minimal ownership or care. Attempts to improve or automate were dismissed, and raising suggestions were seen as complaints. Tasks were often assigned without context — for example, being handed empty tickets and being asked to choose one. Unclear direction and low engagement. Much of the team seemed disengaged and in “rest and vest” mode. Technical decisions lacked vision, and long-term architecture planning was nearly nonexistent.

Explore other reviews about CrowdStrike

5.0
Jun 2, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great place to work at

Cons

No cons at all for me

3.0
May 27, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Remote work culture Is excellent, innovative tech, company's growth and opportunities to protect clients. Felt fortunate to have worked for this organization that has a strong growth tragectoruy and protects clients.

Cons

Manager/Director level: Poor communication from team manager/director, with little to no direction and the lack of team morale. Team members were on their own after training and most meetings could've been an email. The presence of the director was the equivalent of a virtual bulletin board. No ownership was taken from management to lead or guide the team and no sense of loyalty exists between management and team members. Good talent was squandered due to complacency and lack of direction. Company: Con for the company is the unfortunate lay offs that happened after leaving the company. It's a shame they laid off veterans from my former team. The writing on the wall was apparent, from outsourced new hires to the non-competitive compensation for newer hires. The company went from a fun and competitive start up to a disconnected company trying to emulate tech industry trends and "balances the budget" AKA lay offs, to look good to share holders. For a company that nets huge profits year after year, layoffs shouldn't be part of the reality.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All