employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

General Motors (GM)

Engaged Employer

Lazy, Slow, No Growth - Anonymous employee General Motors (GM) Employee Review

3.0
Jun 29, 2017
Anonymous contractor
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Easy and slow-moving projects, Great work-life balance. Highly competitive pays. People say it is a great place to work right before your retirement.

Cons

No room for skill and career growth. The average age of employees is well over 40s. even though I was at the IT center.

avatar
General Motors (GM) Response
8y
Thank you for taking the time to share your concerns.

Explore other reviews about General Motors (GM)

5.0
Jun 5, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Very professional environment - Promotions go to the most qualified regardless of race or gender etc - Doing a great job at your role and/or taking on additional work gets noticed - Competitive salaries and benefits

Cons

Work can be demanding at times and, as a profressional, you're expected to get the job done

3.0
May 6, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

GM offers above-average benefits compared with many employers, including solid healthcare, retirement, and time-off options. Compensation is generally competitive and aligned with market value, especially for engineering and technical roles. The hybrid work schedule at the Tech Center is a positive, offering better flexibility than fully onsite roles while still allowing collaboration with teams in person.

Cons

GM’s current performance management culture can be a major morale killer. The stacked ranking approach and forced distribution create an environment where employees may feel they are competing against peers instead of being evaluated purely on performance. There also appears to be a cap on how many employees within a group can receive higher performance ratings. A manager may tell you throughout the year that you are exceeding expectations, but the final review can still come back as “meets expectations” because of calibration, quotas, or internal politics. Like many large corporations, it can be easy to feel like a small cog in a very large machine. Decision-making is often driven heavily by cost reduction, investor expectations, and headcount efficiency, sometimes at the expense of morale and long-term employee engagement. The “Workplace of Choice” messaging can feel disconnected from the actual employee experience, especially when performance ranking, headcount reduction, and workload expectations do not align with that message.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All