employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

General Motors (GM)

Engaged Employer

CAE Engineer - CAE Engineer General Motors (GM) Employee Review

5.0
Mar 2, 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Generous time off (Holidays) nice benefit package. High performers are rewarded and promoted and put on good projects. GM will sponsor permanent residency for motivated employees. I only spend 40 hrs a week and not expected to be answering emails at all hours of the day. Very good work/life balance. Don't forget that GM employee discount on cars.

Cons

Still remnants of the "good old days". Senior employees that show up very early to avoid work and leave early. GM will not fire them outright, but they still take up space and the spot of a person who would gladly show up and work. Because of the size of GM you really have to work hard to stand out. Otherwise you're lost in the hustle and bustle of daily operations.

avatar
General Motors (GM) Response
8y
Thanks for your honest feedback. We're glad to hear your work/life balance is where you want it to be.

Explore other reviews about General Motors (GM)

5.0
May 4, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Was sometime fun lots of tools big company

Cons

A big company, that had alot of tools

3.0
May 6, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

GM offers above-average benefits compared with many employers, including solid healthcare, retirement, and time-off options. Compensation is generally competitive and aligned with market value, especially for engineering and technical roles. The hybrid work schedule at the Tech Center is a positive, offering better flexibility than fully onsite roles while still allowing collaboration with teams in person.

Cons

GM’s current performance management culture can be a major morale killer. The stacked ranking approach and forced distribution create an environment where employees may feel they are competing against peers instead of being evaluated purely on performance. There also appears to be a cap on how many employees within a group can receive higher performance ratings. A manager may tell you throughout the year that you are exceeding expectations, but the final review can still come back as “meets expectations” because of calibration, quotas, or internal politics. Like many large corporations, it can be easy to feel like a small cog in a very large machine. Decision-making is often driven heavily by cost reduction, investor expectations, and headcount efficiency, sometimes at the expense of morale and long-term employee engagement. The “Workplace of Choice” messaging can feel disconnected from the actual employee experience, especially when performance ranking, headcount reduction, and workload expectations do not align with that message.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All