Good atmosphere but depends on your department - Senior Financial Analyst Greif Employee Review

2.0
May 25, 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good challenging atmosphere. Decent benefits.

Cons

Multiple different divisions that work in silos. No company communication. Hasty decision making. All about the numbers and 60% of stock is owned by 1 family so they are essentially the sole decision makers and drivers. Some of management has been promoted far too early and has nearly no team building, people management skills.

avatar
Greif Response
7y
Thank you for your feedback. We're glad you enjoyed the challenging atmosphere and benefits. We are sorry that your experience with Greif didn’t meet your expectations. We read every review and are dedicated to utilizing the feedback to enhance the experience for all of our Greif colleagues. Thank you again.

Explore other reviews about Greif

5.0
Jun 13, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Employee focused and safety focused

Cons

Consistent Communication and training needs work.

1.0
Jul 7, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Competitive pay and benefits. - Some talented and supportive coworkers. - Good opportunity to learn if you enjoy a large corporate environment and structured processes.

Cons

* In my experience, the culture prioritized appearances over honest feedback. Employee engagement surveys felt heavily emphasized, and I felt there was pressure to submit highly positive responses rather than candid feedback. * Leadership felt very top-down. Open disagreement or differing opinions did not seem to be welcomed, and many decisions appeared to flow through a single executive. * The CHRO’s leadership style was, in my experience, demanding and intimidating. Meetings often involved being put on the spot, conversations could feel one-sided, and it was difficult to speak openly. * AI initiatives became a major organizational focus, sometimes to the point where they seemed to take priority over solving practical business challenges. It often felt like employees were expected to enthusiastically embrace every new AI initiative. * Promotions and recognition did not always appear to align with performance. It often seemed that employees who closely aligned themselves with senior leadership had more opportunities for advancement than those who consistently produced strong work but challenged ideas or kept their heads down. * Overall, the environment felt highly political and very focused on maintaining the company’s image.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All