Working for Greif - Plant Manager Greif Employee Review

2.0
Oct 28, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great people in their plants, safety focused, continuous improvement focused, work life balance is pretty good, a lot of team work in the plants.

Cons

Upper echelons of Greif are really disjointed, leadership is poor, the company makes no capital improvements or reinvestment back into upgrading equipment, budgets are often cut to meet short term goals. Greif promotes who they like, not who is best suited for the job.

avatar
Greif Response
7y
Thank you for your feedback. We are sorry that your experience with Greif didn’t meet your expectations. We read every review and are dedicated to utilizing the feedback to enhance the experience for all of our Greif colleagues. Thank you again.

Explore other reviews about Greif

5.0
Jun 13, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Employee focused and safety focused

Cons

Consistent Communication and training needs work.

1.0
Jul 7, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Competitive pay and benefits. - Some talented and supportive coworkers. - Good opportunity to learn if you enjoy a large corporate environment and structured processes.

Cons

* In my experience, the culture prioritized appearances over honest feedback. Employee engagement surveys felt heavily emphasized, and I felt there was pressure to submit highly positive responses rather than candid feedback. * Leadership felt very top-down. Open disagreement or differing opinions did not seem to be welcomed, and many decisions appeared to flow through a single executive. * The CHRO’s leadership style was, in my experience, demanding and intimidating. Meetings often involved being put on the spot, conversations could feel one-sided, and it was difficult to speak openly. * AI initiatives became a major organizational focus, sometimes to the point where they seemed to take priority over solving practical business challenges. It often felt like employees were expected to enthusiastically embrace every new AI initiative. * Promotions and recognition did not always appear to align with performance. It often seemed that employees who closely aligned themselves with senior leadership had more opportunities for advancement than those who consistently produced strong work but challenged ideas or kept their heads down. * Overall, the environment felt highly political and very focused on maintaining the company’s image.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All