Every day job security is more important than extraordinary pay. - Technical Professional Halliburton Employee Review

4.0
Jan 15, 2009
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Job security especially in a volatile market. It's nice not wondering if you'll still have a job on Monday. The benefits are awesome and the pay is fair. Halliburton has the best training programs in the oil field and they give their employees ample opportunities to continue their training and expand their knowledge about oilfield services.

Cons

Long hours. The pay could be more competitive. Halliburton has a bad reputation from the media so many people look down on employees of big red. As with any oil field service company, our high times and low times are controlled by the market and sometimes we get blamed for high energy prices when in fact Halliburton has no control over the market.

Explore other reviews about Halliburton

5.0
Jun 29, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The company has great benefits

Cons

The con would be you are constantly in inclement weather.

1.0
Jun 18, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

* Strong brand recognition and opportunity to work on large-scale marketing initiatives. * Exposure to technical subject matter and cross-functional collaboration. * Good place to learn how large enterprise organizations operate.

Cons

I joined in a hybrid role where flexibility was an important factor in accepting the position and making personal life decisions. Within about a year, the organization moved to a full return-to-office model. While companies can change workplace policies, the transition felt abrupt and inconsistent in practice. A recurring challenge was that expectations around in-office presence did not always appear to match day-to-day reality. Remote participation still occurred for meetings and operational needs, which created confusion around when flexibility was acceptable and when it was not. Within my department, I also experienced challenges around communication and collaboration. Feedback on projects sometimes arrived late or only after priorities had shifted, and in some cases work was reassigned or substantially changed without clear involvement from the original contributor. Public criticism of work product without prior coaching made it difficult to improve or feel ownership over deliverables. Leadership communication during organizational changes often felt more focused on compliance than employee concerns. Employees raising questions about work arrangements sometimes perceived limited space for open discussion. Over time, the combination of reduced flexibility, inconsistent application of expectations, and limited recognition of specialized contributions negatively affected morale and trust.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All