smart people but no management ability - Programmer Halliburton Employee Review

2.0
Nov 14, 2013
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The staff are mostly likeable, competent people. The work hours are flexible, the location near Fisherman's Wharf is convenient, and they provide free parking, which is big in San Francisco.

Cons

They do not enforce their own policy against workplace harassment. The company president once advised a new salesman not to ask a particular employee a question because she will "Chew your ass off first." That employee once asked someone in the lunchroom with eight other people around if he were considering penile enhancement surgery. There is no room for advancement, and they require everyone to submit to regular random drug testing. They are part of Halliburton, and so they force you to give up your rights to a court hearing and force you to use their conflict resolution employees, the so-called 'rape me clause.'

Explore other reviews about Halliburton

5.0
Jun 29, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The company has great benefits

Cons

The con would be you are constantly in inclement weather.

1.0
Jun 18, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

* Strong brand recognition and opportunity to work on large-scale marketing initiatives. * Exposure to technical subject matter and cross-functional collaboration. * Good place to learn how large enterprise organizations operate.

Cons

I joined in a hybrid role where flexibility was an important factor in accepting the position and making personal life decisions. Within about a year, the organization moved to a full return-to-office model. While companies can change workplace policies, the transition felt abrupt and inconsistent in practice. A recurring challenge was that expectations around in-office presence did not always appear to match day-to-day reality. Remote participation still occurred for meetings and operational needs, which created confusion around when flexibility was acceptable and when it was not. Within my department, I also experienced challenges around communication and collaboration. Feedback on projects sometimes arrived late or only after priorities had shifted, and in some cases work was reassigned or substantially changed without clear involvement from the original contributor. Public criticism of work product without prior coaching made it difficult to improve or feel ownership over deliverables. Leadership communication during organizational changes often felt more focused on compliance than employee concerns. Employees raising questions about work arrangements sometimes perceived limited space for open discussion. Over time, the combination of reduced flexibility, inconsistent application of expectations, and limited recognition of specialized contributions negatively affected morale and trust.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All