Always the Smartest People in the Room - Manager ISO New England Employee Review

1.0
Aug 2, 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Pay, benefits. To some extent, location.

Cons

Harassment, bullying, lack of respect are largely tolerated. No action or reaction to allegations on the part of HR, management, etc. Some might say that employees leave because of a bad boss. At this company, the reasons for turnover run deeper. To put this in perspective, as a manager I was severely harassed by a peer. Yelling, screaming, finger pointing, door slamming. I reported this directly to my supervision and to HR. Nothing was accomplished in doing this although that is the documented procedure. In fact, I directly asked HR to intervene for which they demurred. Stunned but not surprised, I was quick to exit the company after an otherwise long successful tenure. The harasser was promoted soon after.

avatar
ISO New England Response
6y
At ISO New England, we take very seriously the well-being of all of our employees. As in any corporation, interpersonal issues occasionally occur and we address them promptly, though not necessarily in ways that would be transparent to the organization given the sometimes sensitive nature of these matters. GlassDoor provides a valuable forum for discussion, but the anonymity of the site makes it near impossible for us to fully speak to or understand the issues referred to here. Please reach out to someone that you trust in the organization to report your concerns.

Explore other reviews about ISO New England

5.0
May 20, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Interesting work, very smart coworkers, good pay and benefits

Cons

Can be slow moving and bureaucratic.

2.0
Feb 23, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

If you’re looking for stability, this place truly offers it. Many employees start right out of UMass Amherst and build long careers here. There’s a strong culture of longevity and institutional knowledge, and the organization values predictability and operational continuity. The mission is important and meaningful, and there are many dedicated people who genuinely care about keeping critical systems running. For someone who prefers structure, steady pace, and long-term security, this can be a good fit.

Cons

The pace of change can be very slow. Decision-making often involves multiple layers of review, which can make even straightforward improvements feel complex. The culture tends to reward consensus-building and process fluency more than technical innovation or speed. If you thrive in fast-moving, highly empowered environments where experimentation and rapid iteration are encouraged, you may find it frustrating. There is significant bureaucracy, and advancement can feel incremental and tenure-based rather than impact-based. Some teams struggle with clarity of ownership and accountability, which can make it difficult to drive change. Hybrid expectations include regular in-office presence in Holyoke.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All