Selfish Company - Sr. Software Engineer In Time Tec Employee Review

1.0
Apr 5, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

They will pay you your salary on time that is the only pro that you have

Cons

The company seems overly focused on valuation and revenue growth, with leadership prioritizing earnings over employee well-being. The CEO frequently promotes the idea of “working less” while indirectly expecting employees to put in extra effort, creating a disconnect between words and reality. Comparisons are often made to companies like Google and Facebook, but the internal culture, compensation, and opportunities do not match those standards. There is a noticeable lack of alignment between leadership messaging and personal actions, which raises questions about credibility. Despite spending heavily on acquiring new companies, employees see little to no meaningful salary increments or rewards. Promotions are heavily influenced by internal politics, with senior management favoring specific individuals rather than rewarding merit. Employees who joined as freshers are often promoted faster than experienced lateral hires, regardless of actual performance or capability. The company appears to value tenure more than skill, contribution, or dedication. Hard work and impact are not consistently recognized, leading to frustration among high performers. Leadership communication can feel repetitive and overly performative, sometimes using emotional narratives to push employees—especially freshers—to work beyond reasonable expectations. Offsites and internal events can feel more like tools to motivate extra work rather than genuine employee engagement.

Explore other reviews about In Time Tec

5.0
Jun 23, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Cool company thought i could gtow

Cons

Lots of work to do every day

2.0
Jun 15, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

A lot of opportunities for young entry level engineers Unlimited RTO Great coworkers

Cons

There are only good opportunities for young engineers because there are very few sr engineers so they are forced to put young engineers in roles they are not prepared for. They don't want to pay sr engineers a salary that fits their resume leading to good sr engineers leaving or they put people in the sr engineer role that aren't qualified. The Sr Leadership in the US side are in an echo chamber. If another leader has differing opinions, then they are cut out of leadership and either put in a minimal role or are asked to leave the company. Sr leadership holds their influence tightly and if another leader with differing opinions gets too much influence, their role is significantly reduced. This has happened on multiple separate occasions at different levels of leadership The CEO had big promises that I was so hopeful for and believed so much in. But when push comes to shove, individuals are put on the back burner because of money and those promises are broken.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All