employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

International Rescue Committee

Is this your company?

You pay for your passion - Caseworker International Rescue Committee Employee Review

3.0
Apr 8, 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

IRC is an exceptionally effective non-profit. Everything you do will directly benefit a refugee and help them in their process of starting life in America. They don't let their clients fall. You know what you're doing is impactful and meaningful, and that makes the amount of stress almost worth it

Cons

As with many non-profits, the pay rates are horrible for the amount of work and stress and time that you put into the job. You give a lot of yourself mentally and emotionally for a salary that barely pays bills in today's economy. While generally well-managed, the recent emergency response to the Afghanistan crisis was very poorly handled and the burden landed on the emergency hired employees to solve problems with little to no training.

Explore other reviews about International Rescue Committee

5.0
May 24, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Very valuable insights in conducting work. Provides valuable input.

Cons

None that I can think of.

2.0
Apr 22, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

You will meet some amazing and passionate people here who are truly there for the mission. Many came to this country as refugees and immigrants themselves and continue to devote their lives to helping others going through similar experiences. If you end up on the right team, it's an extremely rewarding job.

Cons

Unfortunately, the HQ upper management makes it a toxic place to work. VPs regularly undercut each other publicly (including at all-team meetings and gossiping negatively with staff), especially when potential job cuts were on the horizon. C-Suite didn't listen to staff concerns about upper management and didn't investigate major departures by dedicated staff who left due to poor management despite their dedication to the mission. Leaders picked favorites, ignoring work performance (excusing mediocre performance in some, having high standards for others), and preferred yes-men over staff who wanted to think more critically about the work. Projects were pushed too quickly, despite concerns that it could be detrimental to clients. Positions given to unqualified internal staff who wouldn't be interviewed for the role as external candidates. Senior leaders (director and above) are more focused on keeping their jobs than the mission and will use lower staff work for their own career growth/safety. DEI didn't seem to apply for senior leader roles, where there was little, if any, diversity.

4
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All