Working at Ricardo NA - Engineering Ricardo Employee Review

2.0
Oct 10, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Flexible hour, remote work (during and after the covid)

Cons

- This is a revolving door company. The company WILL blindside you - The boss is incompetent at its best (I wonder how a consulting company acts like this) - Always quoting RFPs with exceptionally high quotations - Too many non engineering redundancies (from higher management and non engineering staffs). Amazingly redundant for an engineering consulting group. - Business development is a joke

avatar
Ricardo Response
1y
Dear Former Employee, Thank you for taking the time to leave us a review. We value all feedback, as it helps us to develop our future people and business strategies, ensuring we can lay the foundations for success. Your feedback is taken seriously and will be passed on to the necessary teams within the business. Wishing you all the very best in your future career.

Explore other reviews about Ricardo

5.0
Nov 3, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Employees often highlight great colleagues and a supportive team environment.

Cons

Senior leadership / management issues: the feedback often mentions lack of clear direction, slow or no career progression, and mixed support.

1.0
Aug 8, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

-Opportunities for growth in technically challenging projects, especially in systems engineering and mobility solutions. -Some engaging tasks for technically skilled engineers, depending on the team and project. -Global presence and potential networking opportunities.

Cons

-Toxic work culture: The work environment at Ricardo North America feels sterile and driven by corporate politics, which has a significant impact on employee morale. There is a noticeable lack of focus on building a positive culture or supporting meaningful change. -HR and management issues: HR appears to be more reactive than proactive, often prioritizing corporate optics over employee well-being. Management is more focused on maintaining appearances and controlling communication rather than listening to employee feedback or addressing concerns that could lead to improvement. This has led to a lack of trust in leadership. -Weaponization of systems: There is a concerning trend where internal systems and processes are used to micromanage employees, creating unnecessary pressure and reducing overall productivity. This has led to a sense of disempowerment among engineers, who feel that their expertise and input are undervalued. -Lack of meaningful training and support: Training for engineers is minimal, leaving individuals to navigate complex systems without the support or resources needed to grow in their roles. This has led to a feeling of stagnation for many employees, as the company does not invest in fostering skill development or long-term career growth. -Management and leadership disconnection: Communication from upper management is often unclear, and decision-making seems disconnected from the actual needs of the team. Engineers may find themselves working on projects with little direction or strategic oversight, which leads to frustration and inefficiency.

3
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All