The ultimate bait and switch - Marketing Science Partner Russell Tobin Employee Review

1.0
Aug 8, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

There are no pros to this organizations.

Cons

When they are recruiting you, everyone is super responsive and seems like they have it together. But once you're in it, it's wildly disorganized. I received my tech late for my assignment. I filled out all the required paperwork weeks in advance and yet I wasn't able to start until 1.5 days into my assignment. Those 1.5 days were docked from my pay. I was summoned for jury duty and they only give a couple weeks to get documentation for excusal. I went around and around with RT for over 3 weeks before they provided proper documentation after asking multiple times and following up almost every day. They messed up my pay one week and wanted me to send in a check and in the same email said they would dock my next paycheck. So which is it? Also who writes check anymore. Lastly, they regularly called me after business hours, which I never answered. They never emailed and asked what the best time was for a call to check in or discuss something. They would just constantly blow up my phone as if I have nothing better to do with my evenings. If you are being recruited by RT, beware - they bait and switch you! First they are nice and prompt and timely and then once they have you hooked, the switch flips and it's chaos.

Explore other reviews about Russell Tobin

5.0
Nov 24, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I have worked at other agencies and Russell Tobin outweighs all of them positively. I feel supported, and like my contribution matters. Management is approachable and wants to see you succeed. Hybrid flexibility is a plus and the office is in a great location with free parking!

Cons

None that I can think of at the moment.

1.0
Jan 18, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

On the surface, this company employs many genuinely decent human beings, especially on the recruiter level. Unfortunately, the culture and leadership structure ensure that those people struggle to succeed.

Cons

The environment is steeped in toxic masculinity, where aggression, dominance, and performative confidence (especially from those who don't understand the industry or have never recruited) are rewarded over collaboration, empathy, or competence. Bullying behavior is normalized, often disguised as “directness” or “high standards,” and there is little accountability when it comes from the right people. Management regularly pits employees against one another, sometimes through surprise or random video calls designed to catch people off guard. These interactions feel less about problem-solving and more about “gotcha” moments—intending to embarrass and expose, while creating tension within the organization. This fosters fear, not excellence, and actively discourages trust or teamwork. Employees are not treated as people—they are treated as salaries and line items. Burnout is common, yet dismissed. Human concerns are framed as weaknesses. In meetings, it is not uncommon for a senior leader to tell women to “smile more,” reinforcing a culture that is out of step with even basic professional norms. At the top, the prevailing goal among senior leaders appears to be self-preservation, as they are promoted beyond their capabilities. Many seem focused on collecting paychecks and avoiding disruption, fully aware that their compensation far exceeds what they could command elsewhere. As a result, meaningful change is avoided, difficult conversations are postponed indefinitely, and dysfunction persists.

6
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All