A great place to work and learn - Anonymous Tucows Employee Review

5.0
Feb 13, 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

A good environment to learn and add skills to the ones you already have. Not a lot of micro managing, they trust that you know what you are doing. Very friendly staff and upper management, a family feel, very supportive. There is always something new to learn and embrace. Education fund. Lots of vacation time. Relaxed but work hard environment. Good work/life balance, very respecting of challenges that come up at work and in personal life. A lot of good, talented people work at this company.

Cons

Communication between departments could be better, there is a lot of break down in this area and if communication was better issues could be resolved quicker and more efficiently. It is starting to get cramped in the office for space, it can be distracting to focus and challenging at times moving around the office.

Explore other reviews about Tucows

5.0
May 27, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great people to work with at hover

Cons

I have faced no cons until now

avatar
Tucows Response
1y
Hi there! Thank you for leaving a review. We are happy to hear that you enjoy working at Tucows!
2.0
Jul 13, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I was able to accomplish a lot during my time there, and cross-functioning teams that I worked with were always appreciative of my efforts and contributions.

Cons

Colleagues were generally unwilling to help onboard or explain technical details, and there was little interest in taking ownership of the project beyond dictating their preferred approaches. Support for learning or adopting technology was severely lacking, and team contributions to actual development work were non-existent (commit log during this time period can prove this). Discussions often drifted into lengthy debates on theoretical or unrelated technical topics rather than focusing on practical solutions. Overall, it felt like there was more emphasis on control than on genuine teamwork or shared progress. There also seemed to be an ongoing struggle among team members to assert themselves as leaders, with more focus on dictating how they think software should be built and teams should function (with continual emphasis on their expertise and where I sit in the team hierarchy) rather than delivering high-quality software. Even after raising concerns, the toxic atmosphere persisted, as some seemed more interested in positioning themselves as leaders to compensate for their lack of technical ability.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All