Career and Growth - Anonymous employee Dow Employee Review

1.0
Apr 9, 2016
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Company is great in terms of working environment, separation of roles and responsibilities, workplace ethics, safety, people leaders, annual bonuses, work life balance. There are silos that seem to restrict collaboration, but company is edging towards a more collaborative environment.

Cons

Career and growth is non-existent except for top 2% of the population. Annual performance reviews and calibrations are an overhead IMO and company should do away with it. Careers are predominately determined at Midland. Employees are told that they are responsible for their own growth which implies no training, positioning for growth. Employee Development Plans exist on paper. The company is impacted by the cyclical nature of its business and budget cuts are inevitable towards the last two quarters. Work has to be planned around that unless you are working on larger multi-year programs Company is Midland, MI based. Living in a small town, where every third person is your colleague, is not for everyone. Most of IT organization is variable workforce, which causes constant flux of skills and knowledge. Innovation is a catchphrase, words more than action. Corporate strategy has been primarily growth through acquisitions and divestitures.

Explore other reviews about Dow

5.0
Apr 16, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Culture and the technical expertise within the company provide for a working environment where you don't work in silo and everyone is willing to help support you

Cons

Administrative systems can be burdensome to overcome.

2.0
Mar 22, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Safety culture, flexibility (although less and less over time). Good health insurance and 401k match

Cons

Dow’s recent years illustrate the challenges of trying to simultaneously satisfy Wall Street’s demands for strong financial performance and aggressive DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) priorities. The company has heavily emphasized inclusion initiatives, including its openly gay CEO publicly sharing that coming out was one of the best days of his life in an internal communication, along with a notable increase in women appointed to senior leadership roles. Hiring practices reportedly require diverse candidate slates—including female candidates—and diverse interview panels before filling positions. These efforts, while well-intentioned, appear to have contributed to a series of questionable strategic decisions. Employees have borne the brunt through repeated rounds of layoffs (including significant cuts announced in recent years), minimal merit increases often in the 2-3% range, stalled promotions, and little turnover at the top levels of leadership. Senior executives seem insulated from the consequences, potentially overlooking how these factors—including their own leadership—may be central to the company’s ongoing struggles.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All