There are worse places to work - Engineer-In-Training Fluor Employee Review

4.0
Jun 28, 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good teams of people on most projects. Lots of knowledgeable staff to help less experienced engineers.

Cons

Large corporate machine leads to a lot of red tape Lower than average wages Company does not care about your development. Nearly impossible to get training.

Explore other reviews about Fluor

5.0
May 25, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Very transparent, room to grow.

Cons

can be political, not what you know but who you know.

4.0
Jun 26, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Hi visibility projects. Rewarding experiences Competitive Pay

Cons

Sub-bar Project Management team. Condescending at times. Entitled. Sense of superiority. Confusing Hierarchical Structure and chain of reporting. Two managers. Administrative Organizational Unit Manager and a project manager. You report to both. Not flexible at the implementation of latest and most robust design software. Extremely cautious about the implementation of AI, sacrificing productivity and cutting edge competitiveness. Extreme focus on employees training on the companies policies and procedures, but not on the technical development of employees. Do not internally promote, rather they hire from outside for vacant higher positions. Remote workers are considered second class citizens. Not equal to those who work from the office, despite their credentials and pedigrees.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All