Good Project Work. Best of the EPCs. - Anonymous employee Fluor Employee Review

3.0
Jun 5, 2015
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good salary (considering that we might be put on leave after a project ends if there's not another one needing our skills) Good teamwork within projects

Cons

Not the company I joined all those years ago. Fluor used to care - or seem to care - more about their people. Now they are all about moving work to low cost (and incidentally high rework) areas around the globe. Senior management is too far away from, or has never worked on, projects. "They" have decided what the people who do the work need. This is never a good strategy.

Explore other reviews about Fluor

5.0
May 25, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Very transparent, room to grow.

Cons

can be political, not what you know but who you know.

4.0
Jun 26, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Hi visibility projects. Rewarding experiences Competitive Pay

Cons

Sub-bar Project Management team. Condescending at times. Entitled. Sense of superiority. Confusing Hierarchical Structure and chain of reporting. Two managers. Administrative Organizational Unit Manager and a project manager. You report to both. Not flexible at the implementation of latest and most robust design software. Extremely cautious about the implementation of AI, sacrificing productivity and cutting edge competitiveness. Extreme focus on employees training on the companies policies and procedures, but not on the technical development of employees. Do not internally promote, rather they hire from outside for vacant higher positions. Remote workers are considered second class citizens. Not equal to those who work from the office, despite their credentials and pedigrees.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All