Great Conpany, But Times are Tough - Director of UX Health Catalyst Employee Review

4.0
Jan 9, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Decent benefits, though they’ve been pulled back recently. Great mission and good people

Cons

Compensation has been stunted lately, raises harder to come buy, bonuses and stock compensation is gone for most roles. They’ve also shrunk a lot of other benefits recently, including 401k match. Morale generally is bit tough, as there have been so many layoffs the last few years, and shifting in the upper levels of management have left us feeling some whiplash. Being public, mixed with some macro economic pressure and some questionable management decisions/strategy have made things not as rosey as they once were.

avatar
Health Catalyst Response
2mo
Thank you for sharing this feedback and for your commitment of more than eight years. We acknowledge that the past few years have been tough, and the impact of compensation changes, benefit reductions, and ongoing organizational shifts is real. We’re focused on doing better. That includes being clearer around our decisions, acknowledging where past choices haven’t served our teams well, and providing a steadier plan for what comes next. Restoring predictability, rebuilding morale, and strengthening the team member experience are top priorities. We appreciate your openness. Your feedback will help shape future improvements.

Explore other reviews about Health Catalyst

5.0
Jan 30, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Remote work, good pay, wonderful people

Cons

The company grew too big too fast and has been trying to downsize erratically

3.0
May 5, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great Talent & Culture: The people here are highly capable, collaborative, and committed to helping each other succeed. The partnership between onshore and offshore teams works well and is a real strength. There’s a culture of grit and stability that has helped the company navigate multiple major transitions over the years. Mission-Critical Engineering: The work involves complex data infrastructure that requires deep technical expertise. It can be demanding, but seeing these systems run successfully and support real-world operations is consistently rewarding.

Cons

Wage Compression and Retention Risk: Compensation for tenured and high-performing staff has not kept pace with the market for specialized data engineering and support leadership. In practice, tenure can feel undervalued or even penalized. This creates risk around losing institutional knowledge and operational continuity. Stagnant Career Progression: Contrary to stated expectations, strong performance ratings do not consistently translate into meaningful, market-aligned compensation growth. The process of how compensation is benchmarked lacks clarity in practice, obscuring how compensation decisions are made and what is required to advance.

5
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All