Good work culture - Analytics Engineer Health Catalyst Employee Review

3.0
Jan 4, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Company has Good work culture

Cons

Company has low pay scale

avatar
Health Catalyst Response
2y
Thanks for your review. I recognize that while economic realities are difficult, and as we balance being EBITDA positive, I am happy that we were able to offer raises to all of our team members in 2023, in line with the compensation data we receive from Radford. If you feel like your compensation falls below industry standard, please share this with your people manager or our Chief People Officer, Linda Llewellyn. Thanks for your contributions to our success. -Dan Burton

Explore other reviews about Health Catalyst

5.0
Nov 11, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Good work-life balance - Motivates to grow

Cons

- Benefits are slimming down

2
avatar
Health Catalyst Response
3mo
Thank you for taking the time to share this feedback. We’re happy to hear you’re experiencing a healthy work-life balance. We hear your concern about benefits. These are critical areas, and we continue to review our compensation and benefits strategies to ensure competitiveness. We are committed to being data-informed in these decisions, and your input helps us do so. Thank you for your continued commitment during this transformational time.
3.0
May 5, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great Talent & Culture: The people here are highly capable, collaborative, and committed to helping each other succeed. The partnership between onshore and offshore teams works well and is a real strength. There’s a culture of grit and stability that has helped the company navigate multiple major transitions over the years. Mission-Critical Engineering: The work involves complex data infrastructure that requires deep technical expertise. It can be demanding, but seeing these systems run successfully and support real-world operations is consistently rewarding.

Cons

Wage Compression and Retention Risk: Compensation for tenured and high-performing staff has not kept pace with the market for specialized data engineering and support leadership. In practice, tenure can feel undervalued or even penalized. This creates risk around losing institutional knowledge and operational continuity. Stagnant Career Progression: Contrary to stated expectations, strong performance ratings do not consistently translate into meaningful, market-aligned compensation growth. The process of how compensation is benchmarked lacks clarity in practice, obscuring how compensation decisions are made and what is required to advance.

5
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All