The mission is the same, the company isn't - Senior Software Engineer Health Catalyst Employee Review

3.0
Jan 5, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The company has a good long future ahead Communication from the highest levels is still good The company mission is worthwhile

Cons

I've been at Health Catalyst through a lot of changes, and the latest round feel like the hardest to swallow. The move to focused almost entirely on services leaves R&D feeling very light and very secondary, asked to do more with less and to focus on things that are neither interesting nor satisfying to work on. Communication from the middle levels is less good. Departmental team meetings feel like the message is just "Toe the company line and work harder" which does not make the future seem hopeful. For developers left at the company, things feel more and more siloed and isolated.

avatar
Health Catalyst Response
2y
Thanks for your thoughtful review and more than eight years of contributions to our success. It sounds like we have improvements to make in our communication in the layers below Leadership Team level. We would love to hear your ideas for doing better here. Please set up time with your Leadership Team member or me. I hope you’ll find a bright future ahead for you at Health Catalyst as a senior software engineer. -Dan Burton

Explore other reviews about Health Catalyst

5.0
Jan 30, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Remote work, good pay, wonderful people

Cons

The company grew too big too fast and has been trying to downsize erratically

3.0
May 5, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great Talent & Culture: The people here are highly capable, collaborative, and committed to helping each other succeed. The partnership between onshore and offshore teams works well and is a real strength. There’s a culture of grit and stability that has helped the company navigate multiple major transitions over the years. Mission-Critical Engineering: The work involves complex data infrastructure that requires deep technical expertise. It can be demanding, but seeing these systems run successfully and support real-world operations is consistently rewarding.

Cons

Wage Compression and Retention Risk: Compensation for tenured and high-performing staff has not kept pace with the market for specialized data engineering and support leadership. In practice, tenure can feel undervalued or even penalized. This creates risk around losing institutional knowledge and operational continuity. Stagnant Career Progression: Contrary to stated expectations, strong performance ratings do not consistently translate into meaningful, market-aligned compensation growth. The process of how compensation is benchmarked lacks clarity in practice, obscuring how compensation decisions are made and what is required to advance.

5
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All