Great colleagues, leadership stinks - Senior Researcher Mathematica Employee Review

2.0
Apr 16, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Mathematica used to be a place where people would go to make their careers. You are surrounded by very smart colleagues who work very hard. In general, it’s a very collegial environment with a strong supervision component help mentor early career staff.

Cons

Senior leadership is tone deaf. They are unable or unwilling to transparently communicate with the larger staff when making very important decisions that impact the entire company. Leadership is bloated and overpaid. They were utterly unprepared for dealing with the second Trump administration. The company seems to be shifting from its roots in policy research to more of a data analytics consultancy. Thus, the skill set that they value reflect that shift. Several years ago, the company articulated company, wide “values.” However with the recent downturn in policy, research and federal contracting, leadership has turned its back on these values, opting instead to protect the company, no matter the cost. These values ring very hollow now that the market has shifted.

Explore other reviews about Mathematica

5.0
Apr 11, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great colleagues, 401k match, and interesting work

Cons

Work life balance could be improved and more ability to move between departments

3.0
Jun 29, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Smart people, impactful work. A real community.

Cons

Poor strategic planning. Rather than performing real analysis and proactive thinking, leadership reacts to the environment. Strategy development and implementation at Mathematica seems like leadership throws wet spaghetti against the wall to see what sticks. In the 2010s, it was predictive modeling. Rather than proactively using predictive modeling to support their client's goals and the organization's mission, they created a data analytics division, hired smart people, and provided no guidance to support the division. Today, AI has replaced predictive modeling. These examples provide two instances of failures of corporate leadership; many more exist. Unfortunately, the company suffers from short-term incentives and an aversion to long-term investments. As an employee-owned company, you would think that the board and leadership would be more responsive to the employees. No! Over time, they have removed employees' voices from decision-making and focused on increasing their own power and independence.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All