NASA at Kennedy Space Center is an amazing place to work, but the government inefficiency can be overwhelming at times. - Engineering NASA Employee Review

4.0
Sep 1, 2012
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Employees are able to see technological marvels, vehicles sent to space, and rocket launches! It gives a great sense of making a difference for the greater good of mankind. The pay, benefits, hours are great. People are pleasant and stress is kept to controllable levels. There is a great opportunity to diversify and learn from others.

Cons

3 Major Complaints Only: 1) Too many Chiefs and not enough Indians (which means you have a chance to make more money, but there should be less management layers and more workers!) 2) NASA has become too risk adverse through the years. They should be willing to take a little extra risk when the rewards could pay off drastically. This manifests itself in veteran employees often stunting the younger and/or more adventurous employees from trying new things and breaking the mold of how things have always been done. 3) As with probably every government job, things move at a glacial pace sometimes. There are a lot of workers that take advantage of their job security and weigh things down.

Explore other reviews about NASA

5.0
Jul 3, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

So many ways to engage yourself in the work Great hours, benefits

Cons

Pay is rather low for Aerospace, even as an intern

1.0
Jul 4, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I have nothing good to say.

Cons

If you are the victim of a crime or experience something illegal connected to NASA, do not blindly trust the internal process to protect you. In my experience, NASA has built relationships with local and federal agencies in a way that can push people right back into NASA’s own internal channels, including HR, the Inspector General, and Protective Services. The problem is that those offices may not have the authority, independence, or experience to properly handle serious criminal or legal issues. Once you are back inside that system, the priority can quickly become protecting the organization, managing liability, and controlling the narrative instead of protecting the person who was harmed. Victim intimidation is not just possible in that kind of environment. It should be expected. Once the organization is involved in controlling the process, the person reporting harm can end up pressured, isolated, discredited, or steered away from outside accountability. That is unacceptable. Victims should not be forced into a process where the organization involved gets to influence how the matter is handled. Internal offices are not a replacement for real legal protection, outside law enforcement, or independent legal counsel. If something illegal happens to you, talk to a lawyer first. Get independent advice. Have your attorney guide you through the appropriate outside agencies and legal channels. Do not assume NASA’s internal process is neutral, independent, or designed to protect you.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All