employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Procore Technologies

Engaged Employer

L-E-G-I-T best of breed, from top to bottom - Enterprise Account Executive Procore Technologies Employee Review

5.0
Feb 22, 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

the hype doesn't even do it justice here - Procore is a culture driven organization, unlike anything I've ever seen. hiring standard are very high, and get some of the very best people there are, across multiple industries, which is creating a flywheel sort of halo effect. Work hard, play hard - win together! Team's know there's part of something special, something unique, which solves a huge need in the marketplace. We really are making the world a better place in what Procore does (reduce construction waste), and moreover, how we do it (w real-life charity backbone) So many opportunities for career and personal growth afforded. Board, Execs, Directors, Management, all very focused on communicating the strategic direction of Procore as a firm, and how that impacts individuals day-to-day lives - said another way, there's clearly articulated purpose at all levels of the organization

Cons

nothing is perfect - Growing companies, have growing pains - its the dual edged reality of staying on the cutting edge. But upon honest reflection, Procore has strikingly few chinks in its armor... said another way, good luck finding much by way of Cons once you walk thru Procore's doors

Explore other reviews about Procore Technologies

1.0
Apr 25, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Total compensation is not bad

Cons

The company has been stuck in a cycle of layoffs, reorganizations, and sudden priority shifts for years. When headcount reductions don’t go far enough, “performance” becomes the fallback justification for exits, even for people who were previously considered strong contributors. Turnover is high across multiple teams, and it’s common to see groups lose several people in a short period of time. A recurring pattern is cutting higher-cost roles and then rebuilding similar functions in lower-cost regions, often framed as “global expansion” or “strategic growth.” In practice, it feels more like cost-cutting for optics rather than a real investment in long-term capability. This contributes to instability and a sense that employees are interchangeable. There is a widespread belief inside the company that going to HR can put your job at risk. Multiple employees across different teams have experienced negative *consequences* shortly after raising concerns, and this perception has become part of the culture. People openly warn each other not to involve HR as it will only make things worse. Trust in HR and leadership is extremely low, and feedback mechanisms are performative rather than genuinely a pulse check on employees. I know of leaders who have attempted to de-anonymize anonymous surveys. Operationally, coordination across time zones and locations is poorly managed, which slows down even simple decisions and adds friction to day-to-day work. Workload expectations often exceed staffing levels, and priorities shift faster than teams can realistically execute, leading to burnout and frustration. The company used to have a much stronger culture, but over the last few years it has deteriorated significantly. Many employees who were once proud to work here now describe it as a place they’re trying to leave, not grow with.

10
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All