Disappointing Experience with Tapfin Recruitment for Qualcomm - Hardware Engineer Qualcomm Employee Review

1.0
Apr 24, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

My experience with Tapfin handling recruitment for Qualcomm was disappointing. While the opportunity to work at Qualcomm was appealing, the lack of professionalism, transparency, and fair treatment from Tapfin overshadowed any potential benefits. I would caution others to approach opportunities managed by Tapfin with skepticism and to thoroughly research and negotiate before accepting any offers.

Cons

My experience with Tapfin, the recruitment agency handling hiring for Qualcomm, left much to be desired. While the opportunity to work at Qualcomm was appealing, the process managed by Tapfin was lacking in professionalism and transparency. Cons: • Unethical practices: The job offer presented by Tapfin seemed to significantly undervalue my skills and experience. It appeared that they were more focused on cutting costs than offering fair compensation. • Lack of transparency: Throughout the recruitment process, Tapfin failed to provide clear and honest information about the job role, compensation package, and benefits. This lack of transparency made it difficult to make informed decisions. • Poor communication: There were significant delays in communication from Tapfin's side, leading to frustration and uncertainty about the status of the application. • Overall slimy vibe: The overall impression left by Tapfin was one of unprofessionalism and insincerity. It felt like they were more concerned with their own interests than those of the candidates.

Explore other reviews about Qualcomm

5.0
May 21, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Competitive Pay and good team

Cons

None, everything was pretty good

4.0
Jun 27, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great design team. Learn a lot in the project. Great resources for self motivated technical improvement.

Cons

Big wave of talented engineers leaving in some critical departments. CEO lacks responsibility on the company development. CEO and CFO have been selling their stocks a lot every year.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All