Healthy work environment - Administrative Assistant RICS Employee Review

4.0
Oct 19, 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Flexible Remote work Non problematic Colleagues and managers were kind and helpful

Cons

UK team would take their time to respond to our regional team delaying our time management and projects Not very easy to grow in the company

avatar
RICS Response
4y
Thank you for your feedback about your time and RICS and your appreciation of our flexible working policy as well as the kindness shown by colleagues and managers alike. We welcome all feedback from former and current employees so we can grow together and face new challenges successfully. We are committed to driving positive changes and we have already taken a number of measures responding to feedback and recommendations to help us achieve this.

Explore other reviews about RICS

4.0
May 15, 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Amazing location and team who are very supportive

Cons

Do not get enough money for what I do

1
avatar
RICS Response
7y
Thank you for your feedback. I’m delighted to hear you enjoy working in your team, although am disappointed you don’t feel properly compensated for the work you do. In the last year, we have implemented improvements to pay review processes to ensure that pay is market competitive and is fully aligned to performance in a way that is consistent and fair. As a current employee, you can read more about this on our intranet, or I’d be happy to discuss this with you further if you contact me at feedback@rics.org. Alistair Milne, Director of People and Corporate Responsibility
2.0
Aug 6, 2014
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Exposure to high level professionals in the property profession, annual professional development course, and good benefits package.

Cons

The local office leadership is lacking in a way that is detrimental to the success of the organization. There's a lack of direction, death by meetings - which usually ends with no further action being taken, the Managing Director's ego is inflated and he has yet to deliver on annual membership acquisition goals, male-centric US office environment, blatant bias, and a lack of transparency. Management is secretive and shady. Outdated software and poor technical support.

5
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All