employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Selective Insurance

Engaged Employer

Too much work with no help from higher-ups. - Claims Adjuster Selective Insurance Employee Review

1.0
Nov 15, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The Benefits and Pay were good.

Cons

The benefits and pay are not worth the stress with this job. Management lacks help, you have teammates that can help, but when you need upper management to help they lack that because they are always busy. They throw so many claims at you and you expect you to know everything right from the start. When you have a claim, the company has a specific process of handling the them, but don’t tell you until something happens or later down the line of something you should know. They give so much extra tasks for a claims adjuster to do that is so barbaric, mean while you’re still suppose to do your work. The Company initiates too much stress. If you don’t have stress, you will have it in this job. I should have listened to the reviews here prior to joining. If you are outside of claims, I don’t know the stress of that, I just know this line of business.

Explore other reviews about Selective Insurance

5.0
Apr 17, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Strong but difficult leadership during transformation.

Cons

Relocation causing some some concern

2
1.0
May 26, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Decent benefits and decent coworkers

Cons

Working at Selective was a toxic work environment shaped by favoritism, excessive workload expectations, and poor boundaries around employee availability. Management often applied expectations unevenly, which created a lack of fairness and accountability. High performance did not always seem to be the primary factor in decision-making, which undermined trust in leadership. There was also a strong “big fish, small pond” dynamic, where internal status and informal influence often carried more weight than actual performance or collaboration. This contributed to a highly political environment where trust between colleagues was limited and information did not always feel safe to share openly. Employees were expected to be available far beyond normal working hours, creating an unsustainable “always on” culture with no real work-life balance. The workload was consistently too high for the compensation provided. Internal politics further interfered with day-to-day work and made collaboration more difficult than it needed to be. In practice, this environment often encouraged self-preservation over teamwork, which made it difficult to build trust or rely on others consistently. Overall, the environment was not structured in a way that supported long-term employee wellbeing or retention. This is not a workplace that supports a healthy work-life balance. For me, the experience felt unsustainable, and over time it became clear that the environment was not conducive to long-term growth or wellbeing.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All