employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Selective Insurance

Engaged Employer

Pros and Cons...just like anywhere - Front End Applications Development Selective Insurance Employee Review

3.0
Jan 19, 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good people...I mean it. The people there, by and large, were very nice. Most everyone seemed willing to help and provide knowledge where possible. Good benefits and salary.

Cons

Meetings, meetings and more meetings. Projects consisted of about 10 managers / spec makers, and one developer. That developer spent more time in meetings about how the project was coming along than actually developing. Another major con is the amount of outsourcing. It seems like all the knowledge in the company is being transferred from implementation to babysitting offshore resources. Because of this and other, more politically motivated reasons, long time employees are leaving, and their knowledge leaves with it.

Explore other reviews about Selective Insurance

5.0
Apr 17, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Strong but difficult leadership during transformation.

Cons

Relocation causing some some concern

2
1.0
May 26, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Decent benefits and decent coworkers

Cons

Working at Selective was a toxic work environment shaped by favoritism, excessive workload expectations, and poor boundaries around employee availability. Management often applied expectations unevenly, which created a lack of fairness and accountability. High performance did not always seem to be the primary factor in decision-making, which undermined trust in leadership. There was also a strong “big fish, small pond” dynamic, where internal status and informal influence often carried more weight than actual performance or collaboration. This contributed to a highly political environment where trust between colleagues was limited and information did not always feel safe to share openly. Employees were expected to be available far beyond normal working hours, creating an unsustainable “always on” culture with no real work-life balance. The workload was consistently too high for the compensation provided. Internal politics further interfered with day-to-day work and made collaboration more difficult than it needed to be. In practice, this environment often encouraged self-preservation over teamwork, which made it difficult to build trust or rely on others consistently. Overall, the environment was not structured in a way that supported long-term employee wellbeing or retention. This is not a workplace that supports a healthy work-life balance. For me, the experience felt unsustainable, and over time it became clear that the environment was not conducive to long-term growth or wellbeing.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All