FreJun reviews

FreJun is an amazing place for people who genuinely want to thrive in a fast-moving startup environment. If you enjoy being challenged, taking ownership, and learning quickly, this place gives you a lot of opportunities to grow. The CEO is extremely ambitious and pushes people to unlock their full potential — while that can feel intense at times, it also helps you develop professionally at a pace that’s hard to find elsewhere. People who adapt to the culture tend to learn a lot, gain meaningful exposure, and grow very quickly. The company focuses on building skills which is a rare find in today's employment scene. The pay is also pretty decent, especially considering the learning and responsibility you get early on.

Joined Frejun as a Technical Content Writer. My main work was around making Frejun Teler visible on Google. I worked genuinely hard on it and did manage to bring organic results too, mostly without any proper support. The problem started with the work culture. No mentorship, no proper team support, no clear workflow. Just constant micromanagement, taunts, pressure, and confusion. Every other day priorities changed. Slowly, I was handling way more than what I was actually hired for. Still, I never argued because I joined to learn and thought things would eventually improve. They didn’t. The leadership is honestly the biggest issue here. Subhash Kalluri the failed CEO creates an environment where nobody feels mentally settled. Big talks during the day, different decisions the next morning, same chaos again and again. A few people close to management control everything internally, while talented employees carry the actual workload and someone else takes the credit. I’ve never seen this level of instability in a company before. During my time there, more than 30 people either resigned or were fired. That alone says enough. People weren’t leaving because work was hard.. startups are supposed to be hard. People were leaving because the environment became mentally exhausting. There were also discussions internally around compliance-related legal issues involving leadership during the Jan-Feb period, which made things feel even more unorganised and uncertain from inside. Another thing I personally felt was that the company focused more on selling the dream of the product than actually improving internal systems or product quality. Sometimes it genuinely felt like convincing customers mattered more than solving real problems. No pros from my side, honestly.