Screen Rant reviews

3.0

56% would recommend to a friend

(56 total reviews)

42% positive business outlook

Screen Rant has an employee rating of 3.0 out of 5 stars, based on 56 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an average working experience there.

Reviews by job title

56 reviews
1.0
Apr 20, 2022

More trouble than it's worth

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Flexible hours, chance to write about things that you love

Cons

This job used to be fun but now I'm seriously wondering if it's worth it. Editors constantly complain that they're low on content, but leave it up to writers to scour the internet for stories. The obnoxious amount of editorial requirements seem to chance DAILY. You'll think you got everything but then receive another "feedback" email passive aggressively listing minor things you didn't even know were a thing. Oh, and all for $10 and MAYBE a few extra bucks if it gets enough views. Currently trying to press on a few more weeks in the hopes that it'll help me land something better.

1.0
Jun 7, 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I wouldn't call them pros at all

Cons

I love games, which is why I wanted to try to monetize said love, but GameRant really does all it can to make the process like scratching nails on a chalkboard. Don't even get me started on what they want you to do in WordPress. As a writer, you're basically the editor. You're taught how to write one way during recruitment, but their actual style is different and requires you to dump even more time filling out fields and forms and everything that you begin to wonder: What are the editors actually doing? Nothing. Playing video games and nothing. The workplace isn't diverse. The entire editorial team is white, and their push for diversity is transparent and only motivated by their website's poor metric performance with minorities after their blunders in the past (Chadwick Boseman, but we're getting there later.) If you can produce your own content for your own blog, it's better than slinking to GameRant's standards. They require you to link 9 times to articles from websites that they own in order to maximize ad profit (and you receive a paltry $10 for your 2-3 hours of work!). The editors are a joke and don't actually do anything but steal topics from other websites, all while refusing to attribute any sourcing to them (except for ONE word at the VERY end, big whoop!) Look how much respect this organization has for the people who create the art that they create "content" about. Google "ScreenRant Apologizes for Publication of Speculative Black Panther 2 Article Just Hours After the Passing of Star Chadwick Boseman." Or if that title basically already told you what they're about, save yourself a search. They used a Boseman's death for clickbait on the next Disney/Marvel movie, and unironically, I know someone who got fired in the middle of their discussion for bereavement to grieve a loved one. But the Boseman article and their treatment of writers shows a larger problem for these websites. The editors come up with these kinds of stories constantly. The writer probably just picked the Boseman topic, or any other bad article, because some editor threw it into an Asana task and called it a day. They lack knowledge of the gaming industry. They even have a note on each Asana task that pretty much says, "The editor probably doesn't know anything about this topic, so basically you'll be editing it." Those are the kind of things that happen working here. It's an article mill that constantly churns out whatever with no concern for its writers or the people whom it gets its content from, as long as whatever they have has ads and nine internal links within it. Most writers quit after recruitment. If you need a published writing credit badly, I'd suggest getting a few bylines and getting out shortly after. Very. Shortly. After.

1.0
Jun 20, 2021

Steer clear!

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Flexible hours You can pitch your own topics

Cons

Where do I start? No communication other than email and Slack, when the editor(s) decide to answer back. Terrible pay. Even though you can write however many articles you want, the wage per article is embarrassing and frankly, insulting. You're a number, but a respected writer. Editors won't communicate any issues or provide constructive criticism; they'd rather terminate your contract than work through issues. As a result, the turnover rate is insane.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 56 Reviews

Glassdoor has 205 Screen Rant reviews submitted anonymously by Screen Rant employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Screen Rant is right for you.