Pros
Fully remote, some good colleagues
Cons
The CEO demonstrates limited understanding of core operational work and he has a temper. There is a strong push to replace human-driven processes with AI, often at the expense of product quality and the overall student experience. Significant resources have been allocated toward AI initiatives, with an expectation of reducing staffing and task time, which has at times resulted in subpar outputs being pushed out prematurely and positioned as innovation. Communication has become increasingly unclear and less effective, particularly following recent leadership changes. The organization appears to have relied heavily on three key employees. The former COO left several months ago, and since then, overall stability and performance have declined. This has led to the departure of the second key employee, which will presumably compound current issues. While the company previously offered a more positive work environment, current conditions make it difficult to recommend as a workplace for new employees.
