employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

The Center for Breakthrough Medicines

Is this your company?

The Center for Breakthrough Medicines reviews

2.2

21% would recommend to a friend

(68 total reviews)

Joerg Ahlgrimm

35% approve of CEO

17% positive business outlook

The Center for Breakthrough Medicines has an employee rating of 2.2 out of 5 stars, based on 68 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an average working experience there. The The Center for Breakthrough Medicines employee rating is 37% below average for employers within the Pharmaceutical & Biotechnology industry (3.5 stars).

Reviews by job title

68 reviews
1.0
Sep 5, 2023

Toxic & Scare Tactics

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Some well meaning co-workers at lower levels. A mission statement focused on helping patients.

Cons

I deleted a previous review because I've heard the founder Brian O'Neil is suing Glassdoor to find the identities of reviewers to seek damages. So I'll keep this one brief and only describe the culture I personally saw. The leadership here truly makes this a toxic and fearful environment. VPs have sent out memo's asking for dirt on their direct reports so they have an excuse to fire them. I've seen grown adults cry from getting yelled at over poor data or sales numbers. I've seen a hypercompetitive environment turn otherwise optimistic science professionals into cut throat pawns who would throw any colleague under the bus if it made them look better. To put it very broadly, the technical employees cut corners to get promising data and make things difficult for the entire project. Like leaving a cult, its only upon leaving the organization that you see how bad things really were.

1.0
May 23, 2023

Mixed review…❤️ vs 🧠

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Employees genuinely care about clients and patients, waking up every day with the goal of delivering quality services and most are comfortable navigating start-up growing pains. Job site could be cool once **if** it’s fully built… Could have great potential if some major changes are made. Good benefits, though can’t be compared to big company benefits in my experience.

Cons

Owner cares only about advancing his own personal agenda, doesn’t know anything about the science or industry, and scares away clients. The culture is fear-based, employees are over-worked and stressed to deliver without resources or efficiencies. Owner demands sales projections and values which are unrealistic (read: made up). Screams and swears at employees to get what he wants. People know it and talk about it but what can be done? Nothing. Communication between teams is terrible as employees are covering their own tails instead of working together. Can’t do the job we came here to do with constant distractions and confusion, changing direction with the wind. Seriously ADHD management. I constantly catch myself thinking, why do I put up with this? What’s wrong with me? Is this just how start-ups work? I don’t think so.

1.0
Jul 18, 2023

I saw the sinking ship and got out!

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Enjoyed my coworkers and company happy hours

Cons

It was palpable that CBM was on a decline: Chronically understaffed and some of the hires they actually did make were very poor choices Being understaffed meant not enough time to train other scientists and also not enough time to have data reviewed before presenting it to clients so errors in data analysis were presented to clients Unnecessary bureaucracy on document workflows, likely just to try to justify some people’s jobs Not enough development in the support roles for labs, forcing scientists to do things way outside of our job descriptions just to complete our work People in positions they didn’t have the credentials for so they couldn’t provide the guidance needed to those under them Very disorganized Clients were being lied to in regards to testing capacity and capabilities Clients were promised completely unrealistic timelines by BD and then management expected scientists to kill themselves to get the work done in time to meet the promised timelines, SMEs weren’t consulted before discussing timelines with clients Also, all the construction on the building was being done by the CEO’s construction company, something felt wrong about that to me. Are 2 companies owned by the same person going to properly bill each other and make sure everything stays kosher? During my time at CBM, CEOs changed from Brian O to Joerg and that was for the best. Brian was notorious for screaming at people who don’t agree with him. Unfortunately he is CEO again and they’ve had 2 rounds of lay offs since I’ve left

Viewing 1 - 3 of 68 Reviews

Glassdoor has 69 The Center for Breakthrough Medicines reviews submitted anonymously by The Center for Breakthrough Medicines employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if The Center for Breakthrough Medicines is right for you.