Distribusion interview questions

I applied online, got invited for a 1st interview with Nayab - she mentioned not to be experienced on interviews (and clearly I could tell that - but she was nice). After this I passed to the second round which was a presentation I needed to prepare and send over. After couple of days of sending the presentation I got a standard rejection email with no feedback on the decision. I then emailed Nayab asking for feedback, after all I had invested time doing the presentation and would expect the company to acknowledge that and tell the candidate why there're not a match. I never got a reply and till this day I have no ideia what went wrong. This is very poor candidate experience. This shows no respect for candidates time and investment.

Long, drawn out, and completely lacking transparency from start to finish. 6 (six!!!) rounds of interviews plus a technical challenge later, I was rejected at the final stage. What really bothers me is not even the rejection itself. It is what came after. I reached out to the TA Lead, who repeatedly emphasized how “transparent” the process supposedly is, and asked for specific feedback on where I fell short. Instead of actual insight, I was told that due to “German laws” they cannot provide the real reason for the rejection, and that I should have used a previous meeting to ask my questions. The only problem is that this “opportunity to ask questions” apparently existed before they even informed me I was being rejected. So that explanation doesn’t really hold up. At that point, the “transparency” claim starts to feel more like branding than reality. If feedback cannot be shared after 6 rounds of evaluation, then it is hard to take the process seriously or feel it was conducted in good faith. From my experience, this does not feel like a clear or respectful hiring process. It feels like a polished surface hiding confusion underneath. I would think twice before investing time here.