The first step is they send you a coding assessment with a SQL challenge and a coding challenge in your preferred language. The coding challenge was hard, I wont give it away, but I will just say that it would be best break down the challenge into a bunch of smaller problems to solve and then combine. The next step was a coding challenge with a tech lead, and a more casual interview. The tech lead responded to questions, offered some thoughts and subtle hints. The next phase was 4 back to back interviews with a HR person, two engineers, and then a relational database design challenge with and engineer and a PM. The interviews with the engineers went shorter than anticipated, they didnt have many questions between them. This may have been my weakest of the 4 interviews because I would consider making separate tables for things that may have made more sense to store in a single table. A day later after the 4 interviews, I got a rejection letter.

After receiving your resume company sends you a link to 75-minute assignment right away (no intro call). It consists of 3 parts: math/logical part, SQL query part, and code challenge. This all makes sense if they really wants to move forward with your candidacy initially. But after spending time on their assignment and getting 100% correct results they just sent me an email "However, for this particular role, we’ve determined that there are candidates who may be better aligned with our needs at this time." a few days later. So, why to ask someone to spend extra time on assignment if you're not interested in that candidate??? Do not apply for Grant Street Group roles - it's just a waste of time!!!