I recently interviewed for the Network Engineer – LAN position at Miratech via the FloCareer platform. While the platform itself was modern, stable, and easy to use, the interview experience was one of the worst I have encountered in my professional career.
It became evident within the first few minutes that the interviewer did not possess sufficient technical knowledge in networking to conduct a technical interview for this role. The interviewer spent a noticeable amount of time reading the job description aloud, carefully pronouncing each word, which suggested a lack of familiarity with the role itself.
The interview questions appeared to be read directly from a script or a screen, with no understanding of the answers being given. There were no follow-up questions, no technical discussion, and no validation of responses, which completely defeated the purpose of a technical round. Regardless of how detailed or structured the answers were, the interviewer simply moved on to the next question.
The overall demeanor of the interviewer was unprofessional and disengaged. At one point, the interviewer closed his eyes, appearing sleepy or inattentive. When I requested that a question be repeated, the interviewer reacted with visible annoyance rather than professionalism. This behavior was uncomfortable and frankly unacceptable in a formal interview setting.
Toward the end of the interview, I asked about the team, expectations, and responsibilities associated with the role — a reasonable and expected question from any candidate genuinely interested in the position. The interviewer again responded with irritation and chose to re-read the job description verbatim, instead of offering any meaningful insight.
The entire interview lasted only 20–25 minutes, which is clearly insufficient to evaluate a candidate’s technical competence, real-world experience, or suitability for a Network Engineer role.
I had prepared thoroughly for this interview and was genuinely interested in joining Miratech. However, I do not believe I was given a fair or respectful opportunity to demonstrate my skills. The experience felt procedural, dismissive, and poorly aligned with the technical nature of the position.
Since the interview was recorded, Miratech should be able to independently review this interaction and verify the concerns raised here.
I am sharing this feedback not out of frustration alone, but out of concern for the credibility of Miratech’s technical hiring process. Candidates for specialized technical roles deserve to be evaluated by qualified interviewers in an environment that reflects professionalism, attentiveness, and respect for the time and preparation involved.
Until significant improvements are made to the interview process, I would caution other candidates applying for technical roles at Miratech to moderate their expectations.
