Very good company to work for but this job requires a particular skill set. - Major Accounts District Manager ADP Employee Review

4.0
Apr 3, 2009
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

ADP provided great training and had wonderful marketing collateral. They used web technology to communicate with employees, as well as provide training. They were very flexible when it came to time off and actually recommended striking a balance between work and home. Senior management was very strong and in some cases local managament was strong. In hindsight, the compensation was very strong, especially if you were just starting with the company where they give you a very generous training salary which give you time to build your pipeline of business. I think ADP is a very good company to work for and even stronger if you are in a larger market.

Cons

My biggest issue with ADP was the lack of communication with local management, especially considering I worked in a smaller office where the manager had to schedule in town visits. It made it difficult to schedule appointments for larger presentations when everyone in your office was fighting for time to get him or her on their respective calendar's. I also believe that upper management didn't fully comprehend the challenges that sales reps face in more rural or smaller markets where outsourcing is viewed differently. It could be very frustrating spending the beginning of the sales process educating prospects on the benefits of outsourcing and how it could positively benefit their bottome line.

Explore other reviews about ADP

5.0
Jun 12, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great job and learned a lot

Cons

Work life balance/ lot of hours

2.0
Jun 15, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Established company with a long history and relatively stable business operations. - Provides a sense of job stability compared to many organizations navigating rapid changes in the current AI-driven market. - Lower risk of frequent restructuring or large-scale layoffs than many high-growth technology companies. - Opportunity to work with experienced employees who have deep institutional and domain knowledge. - Predictable work environment that may appeal to individuals seeking long-term stability over rapid change. - Strong choice for professionals who value job security and a steady career path in an uncertain economic climate.

Cons

- Documentation is limited or rusted, and many operational processes lack clear runbooks or standardized procedures, making onboarding and troubleshooting more difficult than necessary. - If you're coming from a modern, fast-paced engineering environment, the organization may feel behind current industry practices and tooling. - Internal politics can sometimes outweigh technical merit or execution. - There are teams with very long-tenured employees where change and innovation can be difficult to drive. - Decision-making often involves multiple layers of approval, resulting in significant bureaucracy and slower execution. - Processes can move slowly, and collaboration is not always transparent across teams, leading to inefficiencies and occasional confusion around ownership. - In some areas, roles, responsibilities, and operational processes are not clearly defined, creating unnecessary chaos and inconsistent ways of working. - Engineering standards and best practices vary considerably between teams, making cross-team collaboration challenging. - Organizational change tends to happen slowly, which can be frustrating for employees who are focused on modernization, automation, and continuous improvement.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All