Not impressed - Production Worker Adecco Employee Review

2.0
Oct 8, 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Making weekly pay check, helpful floor trainers at Honda Plant, eventually you might be able to be employed at Honda.

Cons

Adecco is toxic and treats employees like children. They make you watch days or videos, which are basically all the same...drink the company Kool aid Obviously we like the company. Honda or we wouldn't be there, they yell at you, like a toddler if you are 30 seconds late from break in front of everyone, you have to sign put to go to the bathroom, Honda gives them way more than they pay us; example Honda is paying minimum of $30 an hour to Adecco and Adecco is paying is 20 and hour, Honda has a much larger attendance bonus they pay Adecco for us, but Adecco only provides $100 per month of perfect attendance, If one day you are late to the training center, they make you wait all week to come back on the same day, you must be working through Adecco for minimum 6 months before being able to be hired direct at Honda (takes most employees 2 years), Adecco doesn't provide any bonus that Honda pays them...November bonus regular employees get, Adecco doesn't offer stocks or anything else full time.employees at Honda get. You would think for all the money Adecco is making off temporary employees, they would treat us like adults and show us respect. If you treat people like children they will behave as such. The training drags out and doesn't have much to do with your actual job on the floor at Honda.

Explore other reviews about Adecco

5.0
May 4, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The team was great to work with

Cons

Could have used an additional recruiter for the time I was there to free up the store manager to meet with more clients

1.0
Mar 27, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Onboarding for new hires was smooth

Cons

My experience with Adecco Staffing Agency reflects a significant disconnect between the expectations set during onboarding and the reality of assignment execution. There appears to be a consistent misalignment between candidate skill sets and the roles they are placed into, which not only undermines performance but also creates unnecessary inefficiencies for both the employee and the client organization. Assignments are often presented without full transparency regarding scope, schedule, or operational requirements, resulting in frequent adjustments that disrupt workflow continuity and personal planning. Additionally, there is a notable deficiency in accurate and timely reporting. Communication regarding assignment details, schedule changes, and performance expectations lacks consistency and clarity. This creates ambiguity in accountability and limits the employee’s ability to effectively manage deliverables. From a process standpoint, this reflects weak coordination and insufficient control mechanisms within their staffing and reporting systems. Most concerning is the apparent lack of advocacy for the employee. A staffing agency should function as an intermediary that ensures alignment between employer needs and employee capabilities while also safeguarding fair treatment and clear communication. In this case, there is a perception that employee concerns—particularly those related to schedule changes, workload expectations, and workplace conditions—are not adequately addressed or escalated. This ultimately results in a work environment that feels transactional rather than supportive, with limited consideration for employee well-being or long-term success.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All