Same problem as the competition: poor middle and Sr. management. - Project Manager CGI Employee Review

3.0
Mar 6, 2010
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Technical personnel is generally very capable and willing to help. Unlike managers, they represent a true asset of the company. I have been working for more than 2 years, possibly less than 5% of the technical personnel I met I would rate as incompetent. Conversely, for manager this percentage would be 95% (and note that I am part of the management force too...). Office in Montreal CCE building is very neatly laid out and a comfortable place to work on.

Cons

Webster defines a bureaucrat as "an administrator concerned with procedural correctness at the expense of people's needs". This, in my view, accurately describes the CGI way of doing things. Management is obsessed with processes and if employees complies to the gazillion number of CGI processes. They don't care how you're actually doing, how you feel about your work, they simply want to do if you're a good soldier by acting and thinking like a CGI cardboard template. Focus is on process compliance. All the rest is in the background, including client satisfaction. I've rarely seen managers with so little insights about what's really going on. Even if you prompt a manager to "think", he/she (really many "she" lately) will react negatively by reminding you what this is the way things need to be done. Luckily enough for them, the competition is equally mediocre, at least in Canada, so they can get by this way... I also remark that the company pretends to have an "international" status but that is not true. Basically all the work force is in 3 countries, Canada, US, India. Some of the international offices are fake (i.e. Italy: there is no such office).

Explore other reviews about CGI

5.0
May 27, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good work environment Strong leadership

Cons

Room for growth can be limited unless you really seek it out.

1.0
Jun 16, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

no specific positives to highlight from my perspective

Cons

I worked at CGI in both India and the USA and observed similar workplace culture concerns across both locations. The only real difference was HR—India HR felt more supportive, while my experience with USA HR was disappointing. My employment ended shortly after maternity leave due to an alleged “lack of projects,” which I experienced as a layoff. I also observed what appeared to be misuse of position by some leaders, including blurred professional boundaries, preferential treatment, and expectations that went beyond normal workplace roles—at times resembling personal-assistant-style demands rather than professional conduct. Surprisingly, I also noticed inconsistent “policies” applied differently to different individuals. In some cases, it felt like the rules changed depending on who you were. When leadership became aware that someone was related to another employee in the organization, it sometimes felt like that person was singled out or targeted rather than treated objectively. Overall, these practices—whether through inconsistent treatment, perceived power misuse, or favoritism—undermine trust, damage workplace culture, and raise serious concerns about fairness and professionalism.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All