The whole company is a scam operation - Manager Capgemini Employee Review

1.0
Feb 23, 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Racked my brains on this one, I guess the good thing is the central office location???

Cons

Where do I start on this. 1. Salary is below market average, career opportunities are unclear. They also recently restructured our grade so we have a "higher sounding position" but it just highlights how far our gap in compensation is with other competitors such as Accenture. 2. Management does not care about you. Not one bit. I was brought in to do a different job than what was advertised and any channel for feedback was ignored. I'm not sure if I am even working in the same company as them! We are nothing but a digit to management. 3. Scope of work. I ended up doing completely different work from what I was hired to do, and obviously would need time to catch up. Instead, you are nothing but a scapegoat there. Our quality of work is also horrifying, I do not know what our interview process is like in our offshore units. Do they pick up anyone with a pulse? Conclusion: This place is run as a slave driving organization. Don't like what you do? We'll hire someone else if you leave. There is no focus on culture or quality here. Even the pay is sub-par and cannot make up for other shortcomings.

Explore other reviews about Capgemini

5.0
Jul 5, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Company provides training on soft skills and technical skills prior to placing on a project.

Cons

Client contracts can end unexpectedly so you may not get to work on a project long term and change from project to project.

1.0
Jun 30, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

there are no pros for this company

Cons

I was laid off after spending several months on the bench, with "lack of available projects" cited as the reason. However, another consultant in the same role who was also without an active client engagement was retained. As a woman and racial minority, I could not ignore the disparity in how these decisions appeared to be made. Before my termination, I reported being recorded without my consent and raised concerns about conduct that I believed reflected implicit bias. I was referred to as "URM" instead of by my name or role, encouraged toward race based employee resource groups rather than meaningful career opportunities, and repeatedly advocated for fair project placement while on the bench. My employment ended shortly after I raised these concerns. Following my termination, I pursued the matter through the appropriate internal and legal channels. I provided documentation supporting my concerns and gave the company multiple opportunities to investigate and resolve the issues. Rather than meaningfully addressing the evidence or acknowledging the seriousness of the allegations, the company denied wrongdoing, offered what I viewed as a nominal severance, and declined to accept accountability. Employees deserve confidence that concerns about discrimination and retaliation will be investigated objectively and fairly. My experience left me with the opposite impression.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All