Difficult to get Project - Consultant Capgemini Employee Review

4.0
Apr 21, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

1.One round of interview. 2. Average Interview (not difficult) 3. No variable (all salary will come in hand) No hidden deduction. 4. Hybrid Model. 5. You can go to nearest Office location for attendance.

Cons

Very difficult to get Project. Some time no Interview call on bench You have to give 2-3 round of interview to get Project.

avatar
Capgemini Response
1y
Thank you for sharing your review. We're pleased to hear that you appreciate the streamlined interview process, straightforward salary structure with no hidden deductions, and the flexibility of our hybrid work model. It's also great to know that the option to attend the nearest office location for attendance is beneficial to you. These aspects are part of our commitment to creating a transparent and adaptable work environment. However, we understand your concerns regarding the difficulty in securing projects and the challenges faced while on the bench. The need to go through multiple rounds of interviews to get a project can be frustrating. Your feedback is invaluable, and we are committed to improving our project allocation process to ensure more consistent opportunities for our employees. We appreciate your dedication and your contributions to our company. Thank you for helping us identify areas for improvement and for being a part of our journey.

Explore other reviews about Capgemini

5.0
Jul 5, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Company provides training on soft skills and technical skills prior to placing on a project.

Cons

Client contracts can end unexpectedly so you may not get to work on a project long term and change from project to project.

1.0
Jun 30, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

there are no pros for this company

Cons

I was laid off after spending several months on the bench, with "lack of available projects" cited as the reason. However, another consultant in the same role who was also without an active client engagement was retained. As a woman and racial minority, I could not ignore the disparity in how these decisions appeared to be made. Before my termination, I reported being recorded without my consent and raised concerns about conduct that I believed reflected implicit bias. I was referred to as "URM" instead of by my name or role, encouraged toward race based employee resource groups rather than meaningful career opportunities, and repeatedly advocated for fair project placement while on the bench. My employment ended shortly after I raised these concerns. Following my termination, I pursued the matter through the appropriate internal and legal channels. I provided documentation supporting my concerns and gave the company multiple opportunities to investigate and resolve the issues. Rather than meaningfully addressing the evidence or acknowledging the seriousness of the allegations, the company denied wrongdoing, offered what I viewed as a nominal severance, and declined to accept accountability. Employees deserve confidence that concerns about discrimination and retaliation will be investigated objectively and fairly. My experience left me with the opposite impression.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All