Corrupt HR and recruiters - Software Development Engineer I Expedia Group Employee Review

3.0
May 6, 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Food, cab, perks and decent quality work and work life balance

Cons

HR department is the biggest problem with india office, they are completely spineless only talent they have is to flatter the top bosses of india office. Recruitment process is totally corrupt, they don't hire people on the basis of merit rather they take people with connections or those who can offer a good amount of money ( yes you read it right ) Recruiters in general are very arrogant they think of themselves as gods. Recently introduced open talent policy( internal employees are allowed to move to different teams ) is not being followed at all, recruiters will not even consider you, unless you lick their feet. To much growth is pushing expedia india to its own coffin, just like any other company which kinda settles down in india expedia is hiring low cost low quality people and it is being promoted by top bosses and the useless HR dept

avatar
Expedia Group Response
9y
We work hard at creating a culture of fairness and transparency and are sorry that your experiences have not been in line. If there are any specific issues that you wish to share, we have a third-party website dedicated to sharing information confidentially so it can be reviewed thoroughly and independently. We strongly encourage you to visit the web website at www.tnwinc.com/expedia to share your experience.

Explore other reviews about Expedia Group

5.0
Jan 25, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Excellent work-life balance and great mix of people to work with

Cons

Work hours can vary depending on which global teams you work with.

2.0
Jun 25, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good pay, supportive manager, and genuinely pleasant colleagues.

Cons

Frequent reorgs and shifting strategic direction made it difficult to build momentum or plan long‑term. Over time, contractor roles became increasingly narrow and production‑focused, which limited opportunities for meaningful skill development. Responsibilities that originally included project management were reduced to primarily email production work. There’s also a broader corporate pattern where work is expected to be completed exactly as written, with little room for judgment or improvement. Even small, quick optimizations can lead to pushback rather than appreciation, creating an environment where going “above and beyond” requires multiple layers of approval — which defeats the purpose of being proactive in the first place. Finally, there’s an in‑office expectation (less strict than for full‑time employees, but still present) for work that can be done entirely remotely. This tends to benefit highly social personalities, but for those who prefer focused, independent work, it feels unnecessary. Social dynamics also play a noticeable role; if you’re not immediately well‑liked or you make a single early mistake, it can create a self‑fulfilling perception that’s difficult to overcome.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All