Fun while it lasted - Lead Program Manager Expedia Group Employee Review

4.0
Feb 24, 2009
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Expedia was a great place to work overall. Having started there while it was still part of Microsoft, I really enjoyed the process of helping to building a company in a new industry from the ground up. There were a lot of opportunities early on to take risks and think outside the box. A lot of young smart technology people mixed with a relatively smaller number of experienced travel industry people resulting in an intellectually stimulating environment focused on turning the tired old travel distribution industry on its ear. Pros: :: A great group of people to work with. :: Good opportunities for young managers to learn grow. :: Good incentive pay (stock options) early on.

Cons

Much of the downsides of working at Expedia can be chalked up to the pains typical of a small successful start-up growing into a mature industry leader. Less focus on innovation and risk. More layers of management. Some mediocre managers rising up through the ranks while some talented ones leave the company. Pretty typical stuff, but since this was my first start-up experience it was pretty disappointing. Opportunities for advancement are limited after rising to the second or third rung in the corporate ladder. This is especially true if you are not a software developer or MBA (as true at Expedia as it was at Microsoft). There are also limited roles for talented people who are not interested in managing. Cons: :: Less focus on technology and innovation as company grew. :: Senior managers seemed less driven and more risk averse as company grew. :: Limited advancement opportunity for "specialists" (non developers/MBAs).

Explore other reviews about Expedia Group

5.0
Jun 24, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

work life balance lots of pto

Cons

limited room for growth in the company

2.0
Jun 25, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good pay, supportive manager, and genuinely pleasant colleagues.

Cons

Frequent reorgs and shifting strategic direction made it difficult to build momentum or plan long‑term. Over time, contractor roles became increasingly narrow and production‑focused, which limited opportunities for meaningful skill development. Responsibilities that originally included project management were reduced to primarily email production work. There’s also a broader corporate pattern where work is expected to be completed exactly as written, with little room for judgment or improvement. Even small, quick optimizations can lead to pushback rather than appreciation, creating an environment where going “above and beyond” requires multiple layers of approval — which defeats the purpose of being proactive in the first place. Finally, there’s an in‑office expectation (less strict than for full‑time employees, but still present) for work that can be done entirely remotely. This tends to benefit highly social personalities, but for those who prefer focused, independent work, it feels unnecessary. Social dynamics also play a noticeable role; if you’re not immediately well‑liked or you make a single early mistake, it can create a self‑fulfilling perception that’s difficult to overcome.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All