Corrupt leadership in IT. Talent is on its way out. - Analyst Expedia Group Employee Review

2.0
Aug 25, 2008
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

A job in IT provides decent pay for little actual effort, as leadership is so corrupt that nothing ever actually gets off the ground. So the benefit is, if you are looking for a steady paycheck while you train for a better position somewhere else, this is one place you can get it. If you want a very serious challenge at maturing an organization from the inside out, this would be a prime candidate, but there is really no entry point where you could accomplish this before you were pushed out. The other reason is, discounts on hotel accommodations through Hotels.com.

Cons

The leadership in IT is corrupt. Politics occupy the majority of their time, an this results is a very distorted view of what is going on in IT and product development. Unfortunately these same people hold all the keys to change, so its like being in a car driven by someone who is intoxicated, will not listen to you, and is separated from you by a plate glass window. As an individual contributor, there is no recognition program - your work is absorbed and added to the resume of your leadership. The culture is dominated by a general lack of trust, and and an unwillingness to work as a team.

Explore other reviews about Expedia Group

5.0
Jun 8, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good leadership and culture, good WLB

Cons

Large organization means structured, slow moving processes

2.0
Jun 25, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good pay, supportive manager, and genuinely pleasant colleagues.

Cons

Frequent reorgs and shifting strategic direction made it difficult to build momentum or plan long‑term. Over time, contractor roles became increasingly narrow and production‑focused, which limited opportunities for meaningful skill development. Responsibilities that originally included project management were reduced to primarily email production work. There’s also a broader corporate pattern where work is expected to be completed exactly as written, with little room for judgment or improvement. Even small, quick optimizations can lead to pushback rather than appreciation, creating an environment where going “above and beyond” requires multiple layers of approval — which defeats the purpose of being proactive in the first place. Finally, there’s an in‑office expectation (less strict than for full‑time employees, but still present) for work that can be done entirely remotely. This tends to benefit highly social personalities, but for those who prefer focused, independent work, it feels unnecessary. Social dynamics also play a noticeable role; if you’re not immediately well‑liked or you make a single early mistake, it can create a self‑fulfilling perception that’s difficult to overcome.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All