Great company but not a place for software developers - Anonymous employee Expedia Group Employee Review

2.0
Oct 3, 2015
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Great visibility in the company. Senior leaders are very approachable. - Company culture in general is good. - Compensation is good

Cons

This is specific to software development positions in the company. Tech doesn't seem to be in the company's DNA. Many outdated technologies are used. Experimenting with new technologies comes with a lot of push back. Main focus is on delivering things, it doesn't matter if the technology used is old or inefficient. As long the solution works, it is acceptable. Any activity that is engineering related but may not directly impact business, like code refactoring, code reviews, etc. aren't encouraged and given low priority. In the company, the culture is business-driving-tech, not tech-driving-business. At times business requirements are finalized without considering tech at all. There's a big gap between business and tech people. Also, non-technical managers managing engineering teams adds to the problem. As a company Expedia may be doing very well. But I wouldn't recommend it to people who want to grow as software developers. Innovation in software development activities is very slow. Chances are high that a developer may get stuck in some mundane tasks and not get involved in any innovative thinking.

Explore other reviews about Expedia Group

5.0
May 4, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- good benefits - depending on team great culture

Cons

Not every team is the same

2.0
Mar 29, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Constant state of transformation is ripe environment for new hires and functional experts from big name tech companies

Cons

Pre-covid the culture was really special. Collaborative, engaging, people-centric, with a unifying mission to enable travel for the world. Since covid there has been a revolving door of executive leadership, and with each round, they throw out the current strategy to try something "new" without building from the current or past successes. Constant change, but no clear vision or strategy of what they are trying to change to. Lack of strategy and low risk tolerance leads to too many priorities with not enough investment to move the needle in anything. Quarterly layoffs, but executed quietly team by team so as not to make news. No psychological safety. Talent strategy since covid is to hire externally over internal promotions to gain "functional expertise" therefore difficult to grow your career. Siloed divisions not working towards common goal. Lacks operating model maturity needed for a company of this size likely do to revolving door of execs and priorities. A cash cow company with an identity crisis trying to be an AI innovator. Build vs buy mentality slows them down. Too many exec pet projects that aren't vetted with proper business cases.

4
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All