Career progression depends as much on politics and visibility as on performance. Genuine results often take a back seat to those who are more skilled at self-promotion or aligning with prevailing internal narratives.
Middle management frequently avoids taking a stand or communicating honestly. The review process feels opaque and predetermined, with “calibration” sessions that seem more about conformity than merit.
The culture has eroded under a long-term remote setup. Virtual events feel like checkbox exercises rather than genuine community-building, and many employees have never met their teams in person.
The company’s focus on social and political messaging has become overbearing. Diversity and inclusion efforts often feel ideological rather than inclusive, leaving some employees feeling alienated or undervalued for reasons unrelated to performance. A more balanced, merit-based approach would foster genuine belonging and fairness.