awful place - Physical Design Engineer IBM Employee Review

1.0
Jul 26, 2008
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

What attracted me the most to IBM Microelectronics was their vision: “we are committed to creating the most advanced technologies, products, services and solutions for our customers around the world and we employ the most creative and innovative minds to help us achieve that.” In addition, the phrase “our people are our greatest asset” was pronounced by the company’s recruiters on numerous occasions.

Cons

I was working hard, making a lot of progress and getting praise from my manager and co-workers. One day I read an article on the Internet saying that competition in the microelectronics industry had intensified and companies should look at various options to remain successful. I showed the article to my manager and asked for his opinion. His response was “not to worry and keep up the good work”. Of course I expected more from my manager, but I noticed that him and other first line managers at IBM were so much involved with just managing their direct reports and waiting for a directive from above on what to do, so they rarely if ever took initiative to propose any anticipatory changes or tuning. In March 2002 Sam Palmisano became the CEO of the company. He joined IBM in 1973 as a salesman in Baltimore and later moved up the ranks as senior managing director of operations for IBM Japan, senior vice president for the personal systems group, the enterprise systems group and IBM global services, and president and chief operating officer. Shortly thereafter, when IBM Microelectronics announced its financial results for the first quarter of 2002, multi- million losses were revealed. Unfortunately, the senior management didn’t or couldn’t do much to anticipate this, so now everyone was waiting what the new CEO would do in this difficult business situation. At that point of time only reactive changes could be made. Instead of adaptation, which in my opinion required a lot more skills from Palmisano, he chose re-creation. What was his solution? Massive job cuts. In June of 2002 approximately 1,500 out of 7,000 employees were laid off in Burlington and I was one of them. Workers piled their belongings in cardboard boxes and left the office for good, collecting pay for the next 60 days. Among 1,500 employees who were laid off there was a substantial number of new hires who joined the company just a little bit more than a year ago. All of the sudden, from the greatest asset people became something that can be easily dispose of in order to cut costs.

Explore other reviews about IBM

5.0
Jun 10, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Relocation bonus and welcoming team

Cons

Very large and corporate at times

4.0
Aug 26, 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Disclaimer: A lot of what I'm writing below of course depends on the work area and management chain. But I found this to be fairly pervasive policies in IBM in my 9+ years with the company. 1. IBM's policies and management are very flexible when it comes to working remotely or accommodating various life situations (sick days, doctor visits, etc.). Management is encouraged to measure an employee by their work and impact, and not by hours spent at their office. 2. Great colleagues! Though unfortunately, many have been leaving due to the instability of IBM's HW development business. 3. At least in my area, there's a high level of flexibility on which projects should I undertake based on my and my management assessment of business impact.

Cons

1. Unfortunately, IBM still uses the "normal distribution" rating system, where at the end of the year each employee is ranked as a top contributor (5%), above average contributor (15%), average contributor (~75%), and bottom contributor (5%). This curve is difficult to apply in the R&D world, where you may have many members of the team working long and hard hours, and end up being "average contributors" at the end of the year, because there just isn't room for all to be top contributors. 2. The above may not be so disturbing, if only IBM didn't practically cancelled all raises, performance bonuses and incentive for the non top-performers. I've had a consistent "above average" rating in the last 4-5 years, and my raise and performance bonus were ridiculous mere 1.5-2% of my salary. Were I rated "average contributor" I would have gotten NOTHING. So you can imagine that people can go year after year without any raise to their salary. From talking to manager friend, this is IBM's way to eliminate the non-top-performers without having to fire them, as part of its direction of reducing US manpower. 3. Hiring freeze in many areas - again, as part of IBM's attempt to reduce its workforce across North America and Europe we see many jobs move to the India and Far East markets. This is of course upsetting to see local teams shrink and disappear, especially when many great local IBM colleagues and experts begin to drop out. From my experience thus far working with India SW teams - they are still very far away from the standards I would have expected from US and Europe based teams. 4. Poor top down communication about company's and divisions' future. Employees learn from rumors and news websites what's about to come...

636
avatar
IBM Response
10y
Thanks for sharing your experience, and we're glad that you've had a positive experience working with talented colleagues and taking advantage of IBM's programs. IBM is in the midst of a major transformation, --our Systems business is going through its own changes to strengthen competitiveness. Change is never easy. As part of our transformation, we just launched a whole new approach for how we are coaching employees, delivering feedback and managing reviews. No distribution guidelines or what some think of as 'stacked rankings." What's particularly great is that this was co-designed with our employee base from all over the world... to the tune of hundreds of thousands of page views, comments, on-line debates and discussions. IBMers even named the new system Checkpoint, to reflect the regular feedback rituals we're adopting. Managers are more empowered with the new methodology to help them acknowledge the great work of their teams and help their employees develop professionally. These steps and more are showing up in our employee surveys as well. So IBMers are feeling the change. We are confident these changes will help us in continuing to attract and retain great talent.
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All