Good QA department to work for - Senior QA Engineer Infor Employee Review

4.0
Jun 8, 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I have been here for more than 5 years and feel blessed to be here. Mgmt invested in good QA practices and some tools, and company has undergone many process changes. It is feeling of happiness that we have come a long way even with 2 mergers after i joined. Unlike some reviews , mangers & colleagues are cooperative. it feels to be like in college - No particular Dress code too. Managers understand the pain of travelling from far and have given a lot of flexibility on the timing. In which company can you come at 11/12 AM , still get to laugh with your manger - of course provided on time deliverable's are met. The QA VP has a good vision for the team and comes to India to often meet the team & share it. Company is developing advanced products that are really having great scope to sell. Some of the managers have specialized in various modules being at GTnexus for a long time - not many know unless you talk to them. From my personal experience, I have learnt a lot when I hit a conversation with my manager on technology. They are hands on in the past through which they carry a lot of information. The management often try the best to hire the good people. So we end up having a great team. I think the environment is good, so there are hardly any people who leave the company. As they say.. People leave managers not company. Colleagues are very supportive too & that is important for me. We get to see a lot of team work with minimal/no politics. There's a lot of work pressure for past 2 years - Can be a Cons item too.

Cons

For past 2 years, the Appraisal system for pay is too systematic like a service based company. The managers are either helpless or have deff ears to bargain against increments/raises. For people with good salary the % works, but for beginners it is not great.. Some managers pester & execute test cases and then pester to fix up the problems that are small problem ( no big problems) - so request mangers to please NOT micro manage us. Mangers should have belief that their team will get it done for them. They should challenge us when we fail. Lot of work pressure. There is recognition if you take up parallel items and work on them. This can become tough at times. Mgmt gives some awards sometimes for recognizing people. Some people/teams are forgotten to be given and later handed over offline. These small things should be taken care. There seems to be too much flexibility in the office timings, it sometimes really becomes difficult to handover the work to your colleague if the overlapping time is just half day. The person who comes late does not get to do any team work. allowing Flexibility is great but should make sure flexibilty is not abused. The number of leaves are very less per year. the leave policy is not great.

Explore other reviews about Infor

5.0
Jan 27, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great company culture, everybody very helpful

Cons

Do not like the location

1
3.0
May 22, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I like working at Infor. I’ve been here for roughly five years. I enjoy the work, believe in the product, and genuinely like the people I work with and for.

Cons

There has recently been a very strong “AI-first” push across the company. To be clear, I understand the value. AI absolutely can streamline operations and free people up to focus on higher-value work. Used correctly, it’s useful. The problem is that there does not appear to be a clear or consistently enforced policy around what constitutes appropriate use versus misuse or outright abuse. There should be better guidance around where AI helps productivity, where it introduces risk (especially around company information being entered into public tools), and where the line is between use and replacement of basic job responsibilities. For example, I recently had a coworker explain that they created AI automation to read and manage their emails so they rarely have to review or respond themselves, while acknowledging things are likely missed. The same person records meetings for transcripts, leaves their laptop during the call, then relies on AI afterward to summarize what happened. At a certain point, it raises a legitimate question: are we using AI to improve productivity, or are we using it to avoid participating in the job altogether? Right now, reactions internally seem split. Some employees view this as a serious abuse of the technology, while others appear fully on board with it. That disconnect alone suggests the company needs clearer expectations and policy guidance. AI should support human judgment and critical thinking. Not eliminate the need for employees to engage in their work entirely. And how does the company determine when that is being done?

avatar
Infor Response
1mo
At this time of change, growth, and continuous improvement, our employees are encouraged to speak up if they see an opportunity to make our ways of working better. Please send your feedback to myfeedback@infor.com so we can better understand your concern.
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All