Decent Start - Anonymous employee Infor Employee Review

2.0
Oct 21, 2013
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

-Great home/work balance. Flexible hours, casual environment. -Really a pretty simple job- work hard and you can make some extra cash. Currently I make a 35K base plus 10K target commission...which is TOTALLY reachable. I'll likely pull in 47-48K total this year, which is pretty darn good given the job.

Cons

-Upper management is terrible. No clue what's going on, they change their minds twice a day about policies. -NO room for mobility. I'm content with being here and building some experience, but am quite certain that I will be looking elsewhere for my next job. -Corporate mess...executive team lies to us about everything. Treated very poorly when it comes down to it.

Explore other reviews about Infor

5.0
May 5, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great company to work for. Flexible. Great mentors and access to leadership.

Cons

Leadership changes frequently Infor has a few "focus" industries - its best to be in one of those lines of business if you want to maximize sales compensation.

avatar
Infor Response
3w
Thank you for your review. We’re delighted to hear about your positive experience with us.​ ​ We are the forefront of industry trends and emerging technologies, ensuring our people constantly have new opportunities to learn, grow, and accelerate their careers. ​
3.0
May 22, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I like working at Infor. I’ve been here for roughly five years. I enjoy the work, believe in the product, and genuinely like the people I work with and for.

Cons

There has recently been a very strong “AI-first” push across the company. To be clear, I understand the value. AI absolutely can streamline operations and free people up to focus on higher-value work. Used correctly, it’s useful. The problem is that there does not appear to be a clear or consistently enforced policy around what constitutes appropriate use versus misuse or outright abuse. There should be better guidance around where AI helps productivity, where it introduces risk (especially around company information being entered into public tools), and where the line is between use and replacement of basic job responsibilities. For example, I recently had a coworker explain that they created AI automation to read and manage their emails so they rarely have to review or respond themselves, while acknowledging things are likely missed. The same person records meetings for transcripts, leaves their laptop during the call, then relies on AI afterward to summarize what happened. At a certain point, it raises a legitimate question: are we using AI to improve productivity, or are we using it to avoid participating in the job altogether? Right now, reactions internally seem split. Some employees view this as a serious abuse of the technology, while others appear fully on board with it. That disconnect alone suggests the company needs clearer expectations and policy guidance. AI should support human judgment and critical thinking. Not eliminate the need for employees to engage in their work entirely. And how does the company determine when that is being done?

avatar
Infor Response
3w
At this time of change, growth, and continuous improvement, our employees are encouraged to speak up if they see an opportunity to make our ways of working better. Please send your feedback to myfeedback@infor.com so we can better understand your concern.
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All