Infor not all about employees - Anonymous employee Infor Employee Review

1.0
Aug 25, 2015
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Vacation equals four weeks;

Cons

New management is all from an acquired software Talent Sciences. They only managed one piece of software but because they have PhD's they think they are able to implement their same processes for the entire organization. The problem is they are getting rid of key employees who have been there for years. Almost all of the Lawson employees, Enwisen employees are gone after the merger. Those who remain are seen as negative and Talent Sciences wants them all out the door. If you challenge anything you better have your resume updated. Work/Life is doesn't exist for the regular employee however managers always get their vacation but refuse to allow employees time to take their vacation even when accrued. Infor is trying to get on the stock exchange so they are trying to look more profitable. By doing this, they are putting employees into high amounts of overtime due to not hiring replacements. Moral is low and management doesn't care. Management was informed of issues with current software over a year ago and now are starting to look at ways to improve the software. Clients are leaving for competitors like Workday, SAP and Oracle and for good reasons. Management is all about pushing jobs to Manila which it takes 2-3 of them to do what we 1 person does. Everyone knows it but they refuse to reconsider because they claim its cheaper. When you give work to Manila employees they generally take off and you're stuck doing the work. Management doesn't care and allows them to do this. Also they are to support US employees but they don't work US hours only their day hours. On their day hours they barely do anything. Most are completely ineffective costing US resources more time to train ineffective employees. The constant mergers have taken a toll on the company and moral of the company. Only Talent Sciences is seen as doing anything whereas the rest of us who work hard and get good client reviews are stuck in this horrible moral experience.

Explore other reviews about Infor

5.0
May 5, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great company to work for. Flexible. Great mentors and access to leadership.

Cons

Leadership changes frequently Infor has a few "focus" industries - its best to be in one of those lines of business if you want to maximize sales compensation.

avatar
Infor Response
1mo
Thank you for your review. We’re delighted to hear about your positive experience with us.​ ​ We are the forefront of industry trends and emerging technologies, ensuring our people constantly have new opportunities to learn, grow, and accelerate their careers. ​
3.0
May 22, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I like working at Infor. I’ve been here for roughly five years. I enjoy the work, believe in the product, and genuinely like the people I work with and for.

Cons

There has recently been a very strong “AI-first” push across the company. To be clear, I understand the value. AI absolutely can streamline operations and free people up to focus on higher-value work. Used correctly, it’s useful. The problem is that there does not appear to be a clear or consistently enforced policy around what constitutes appropriate use versus misuse or outright abuse. There should be better guidance around where AI helps productivity, where it introduces risk (especially around company information being entered into public tools), and where the line is between use and replacement of basic job responsibilities. For example, I recently had a coworker explain that they created AI automation to read and manage their emails so they rarely have to review or respond themselves, while acknowledging things are likely missed. The same person records meetings for transcripts, leaves their laptop during the call, then relies on AI afterward to summarize what happened. At a certain point, it raises a legitimate question: are we using AI to improve productivity, or are we using it to avoid participating in the job altogether? Right now, reactions internally seem split. Some employees view this as a serious abuse of the technology, while others appear fully on board with it. That disconnect alone suggests the company needs clearer expectations and policy guidance. AI should support human judgment and critical thinking. Not eliminate the need for employees to engage in their work entirely. And how does the company determine when that is being done?

avatar
Infor Response
1mo
At this time of change, growth, and continuous improvement, our employees are encouraged to speak up if they see an opportunity to make our ways of working better. Please send your feedback to myfeedback@infor.com so we can better understand your concern.
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All