Subscription Renewal - Maintenance and Support Infor Employee Review

3.0
Oct 2, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great team members, good PTO package, flexible hours, work from home option. I work as a maintenance subscription renewal manager and our team brought in over $200M to the company last year and we received a 3% raise. Globally, our dept. brought in $1.5B in revenue for the last FY (over 50% of the company's revenue) and we barely saw a salary increase. Too much focus on getting that IPO and not enough on the employees that are working hard to meet the goals.

Cons

No real advancement in salary except 2-3% annually even though you may have over achieved your goals. Management keeps changing focus and makes it very difficult to achieve compensation goals. Salary is below comparable positions from competing companies. Management keeps adding more duties to job description in order to get company ready for the $$$ needed for an IPO in the near future.

Explore other reviews about Infor

5.0
Aug 31, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good culture and work environment

Cons

Low average salary compared to abroad offices

3.0
May 22, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I like working at Infor. I’ve been here for roughly five years. I enjoy the work, believe in the product, and genuinely like the people I work with and for.

Cons

There has recently been a very strong “AI-first” push across the company. To be clear, I understand the value. AI absolutely can streamline operations and free people up to focus on higher-value work. Used correctly, it’s useful. The problem is that there does not appear to be a clear or consistently enforced policy around what constitutes appropriate use versus misuse or outright abuse. There should be better guidance around where AI helps productivity, where it introduces risk (especially around company information being entered into public tools), and where the line is between use and replacement of basic job responsibilities. For example, I recently had a coworker explain that they created AI automation to read and manage their emails so they rarely have to review or respond themselves, while acknowledging things are likely missed. The same person records meetings for transcripts, leaves their laptop during the call, then relies on AI afterward to summarize what happened. At a certain point, it raises a legitimate question: are we using AI to improve productivity, or are we using it to avoid participating in the job altogether? Right now, reactions internally seem split. Some employees view this as a serious abuse of the technology, while others appear fully on board with it. That disconnect alone suggests the company needs clearer expectations and policy guidance. AI should support human judgment and critical thinking. Not eliminate the need for employees to engage in their work entirely. And how does the company determine when that is being done?

avatar
Infor Response
1mo
At this time of change, growth, and continuous improvement, our employees are encouraged to speak up if they see an opportunity to make our ways of working better. Please send your feedback to myfeedback@infor.com so we can better understand your concern.
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All