Bad Company - Infosys Public Services misleading not an american based company - Senior Principal Infosys Employee Review

2.0
May 27, 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

There is no good reason to work for Infosys Public Services. It was represented as an North American company business model , which it is not . it is a shell for Infosys and Bangelore. It is a "Indian Boys Club" and women have little respect . The quality of work is best described as was stated to me" we don"t care how it is done we are just doing it to get paid ".

Cons

All travel except air is put on the employee credit card, if you don't use personal credit they tell you to get one or your job is in question. They are slow to reimburse , and take challenge with everyone's expenses. Expenses are reviewed bu someone in India. This is only true for US American employees as the Indian employees are treated differently. The projects are staffed by Indian resources who do not have US Industry experience that are brought to US for the work and they play an interesting visa game.

Explore other reviews about Infosys

5.0
Feb 27, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Management Resources Work life Balance

Cons

Pay and benefits could be better

4.0
Jun 10, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Job stability – Infosys is known for long-term employment and steady projects. Strong brand value – Having Infosys on your resume adds credibility and global recognition. Good learning opportunities – Access to internal learning platforms, certifications, and training programs (especially for freshers). Global exposure – Opportunities to work with international clients and global delivery teams. Structured processes – Well-defined policies, documentation, and governance. Work-life balance (project dependent) – Many teams offer reasonable working hours. Employee benefits – Health insurance, paid leaves, and wellness initiatives. Safe and inclusive workplace – Strong focus on ethics, compliance, and diversity.

Cons

Salary growth can be slow – Compensation increments may be lower compared to market standards. Limited flexibility in role changes – Internal mobility and project switches can take time. Bureaucratic processes – Decision-making can be slow due to multiple approval layers. Project allocation delays – Bench time and delayed onboarding to projects can happen. Variable learning exposure – Skill growth depends heavily on the project assigned. Less innovation in some teams – Certain projects may use legacy technologies. Onsite opportunities are limited – Compared to earlier years, onsite roles are fewer. Performance appraisal transparency – Rating systems may feel rigid or unclear.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All